|
|
News and Reviews for Book Lovers - Issue 13
Current mood: satisfied
BOOK REVIEW
WIFE IN THE FAST LANE
KAREN QUINN
After finishing reading WIFE IN THE FAST LANE by KAREN QUINN I was at lost of what I was going to write for a review. It was not that I did not enjoy the book. The problem is I think I enjoyed it too much. You ask how could I possibly enjoy a book too much? Well, let me explain:
I went to work last night fit to be tied because I still could not think of an interesting book review to write for Karen Quinn's entertaining second novel WIFE IN THE FAST LANE. I tell you it was really bothering me, so I decided to start telling some of my co-workers about my dilemma. I was secretly hoping to get inspired by a brilliant idea of what to write for my review.
I started by telling my co-workers that I finished reading WIFE IN THE FAST LANE by KAREN QUINN, which is a 400-page novel, in a day and a half. I told them that I read it way too fast. I just could not put the book down. I got so caught up in the characters and the story that I desperately wanted to know how the book ended. You see, I usually read the books that I intend to review at a much slower pace to make sure I don't miss anything, big or small. I also like to take in the writing style of the particular author since I am an aspiring writer. You can learn so much about writing from just reading books. While reading the novel I also try to think of different things that I want to include in my review of the novel. Trust me I put a lot of thought and effort into each and every review that I write. However, I just allowed myself to sit back and enjoy reading this light breezy novel, which I am sure the author, Karen Quinn, intended when she wrote WIFE IN THE FAST LANE.
I then went on to tell my fellow co-workers that I usually write book reviews on how I can relate my own life experiences to that of the main character in the book. I did not know how I could possibly relate to the successful life of the main character, Christy Hayes, which Karen Quinn created in her novel WIFE IN THE FAST LANE.
The main character, Christy Hayes, has won two Olympic gold medals, built a multimillion-dollar business, landed a gorgeous and powerful CEO husband, and inherits custody of an eleven-year old girl. One of my co-workers said to me of course you could relate your life to the book. I kind of just gave her a funny look. Did she know something I didn't? She just simply stated that I was a wife with a job, and that I seemed to be very ambitious and successful with my book reviews and my writing. Well, I guess there is some truth in that.
I was feeling particularly comfortable with this co-worker, so I started to tell her how in the novel WIFE IN THE FAST LANE by KAREN QUINN a seductive single woman tries to steal the main character's husband from right under her nose. I proceeded to tell my co-worker stories about how my husband who is an Executive Chef on Norwegian Cruise Line constantly has female crewmembers going up to him and asking him if he wants a girlfriend. He always politely replies that he is happily married. I have worked on cruise ships and believe me the women are that blunt, especially with high-ranking officers who are good looking and make good money. I even told her the story of the time that I met my husband's boss. After my husband introduced me to his boss, his boss turned to my husband and quite arrogantly said, 'you could have any girl on the ship. Why did you marry a Canadian? You don't need a passport.' By the way, my husband is German. My mouth must have dropped to the floor. I was standing right there. EXCUSE ME! I am sorry that I am not the typical wife of a ship's officer who is a six-foot model with legs that go on forever. I tell you I was so upset that I almost broke down crying right then and there. Later that night my husband told me that he loves me just the way I am. I think he stole that line from the move Bridget Jones's Diary. LOL. It worked. I felt a lot better about myself.
After my discussion with my co-worker she turned to me with a smile on her face and said, 'Trisha, I think you just wrote your book review for WIFE IN THE FAST LANE by KAREN QUINN.' She was right. What a relief. I wanted to write a review that was intelligent, honest, and something that I was proud of. I think I accomplished that with this review. I want to thank Sarah for listening to me babble for so long. You are a great friend and a great co-worker.
I recommend WIFE IN THE FAST LANE by KAREN QUINN to all women who feel that they are living in the fast lane.
Karen Quinn is also the bestselling author of THE IVY CHRONICLES, which has been optioned as a major motion picture slated to star Catherine Zeta Jones.
Check out Karen Quinn on MySpace, she is one of my top friends, http://www.myspace.com/authorkarenquinn. You can also find out more about the author and her novels on her websites www.karenquinn.net/ and www.wifeinthefastlane.com.
I hope you enjoyed my thirteenth issue of NEWS AND REVIEWS FOR BOOK LOVERS. Please leave comments. I really appreciate everyone's feedback.
Cheers,
Trisha
Wikipedia's Not the Net Police
The online encyclopedia says it will verify contributors' credentials, but the job of monitoring Internet honesty belongs to all of us
by B.L. Ochman
Responding to a recent brouhaha over a contributor's false diploma, Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales announced that contributors' professional credentials will be verified from now on. But why? And by whom?
Human beings' desire to make ourselves seem like more than we are is part of our hard wiring. And I don't think it's up to Wikipedia to change it.
Calling oneself a professor with a doctoral degree when one is actually a 24-year-old college dropout is a lie. So is plagiarism. Both lying and stealing have been going on since before there was language. And both will continue. Now user-generated sites like Wikipedia provide new and better tools to make deception easier.
Jimmy Wales, for all his good intentions, can't stop that. Nor should he try. Here are two plagiarism cases to demonstrate why Wales' attempt at fact-checking is a losing battle.
Plagiarism Unpunished
In 1985, Emily Dickinson scholar and author Dorothy Oberhaus claims to have had her PhD thesis, "The Religious Voice of Emily Dickinson," ripped off almost in its entirety by Jane Eberwein, who reworked the text in one sabbatical year and published it as her only book on Dickinson.
When Oberhaus protested to the Emily Dickinson International Society (where Eberwein has been a board member), to the book's publisher, and to the Modern Language Assn., with exhaustive proof of the plagiarism, she was told to take it up with Eberwein.
Says Oberhaus, "In other words, they were saying to a woman who has been raped, 'Sorry, dear, talk to your rapist!'" A quarter century later, Oberhaus' plagiarist continues to claim credit for the true scholar's work, even when the two appear at the same conferences.
At least Oberhaus knows whom to accuse. These days, it's hard to know who is stealing from you, or accusing you of stealing intellectual property. Online thieves have more tools at their fingertips, as the second example demonstrates.
Rudner Rip-Off?
The announcement of the prizes in the contest promoting Karen Quinn's novel Wife in the Fast Lane (Touchstone, 2007)—a contest I produced and promoted via blog advertising—is embroiled in a scandal involving Wikipedia. It proves that people who want to cheat will always find a way.
I'm sure the kerfuffle could provide Quinn with a plot for her next novel. It involves not only Wikipedia and plagiarism but also hoaxes, mockery, bloggers, vote-stuffing, cloaked e-mail addresses, false identities, comedian Rita Rudner, and a lot of housewives.
More than 750 people entered Quinn's contest with one-liners, essays, and videos describing their lives in the fast lane. The top 10 finalists in each category were selected by a group of volunteer judges. Then the public selected winners from among the finalists and the fun began in earnest.
Quinn was about to announce the winners when an e-mail arrived, accusing the winner of plagiarizing comic Rita Rudner. As proof, it linked to a Wikipedia entry that contained the quote submitted by the contest entrant.
Loser's Ploy
With just a little amateur sleuthing, it was easy to learn that the quote was added two hours before the finger-pointing e-mail was sent. Nonetheless, just to be sure, Quinn contacted Rudner herself, who confirmed that the contest entry hadn't been stolen from her material.
And then—poof!—the Wikipedia quote disappeared. Without naming names, it's clear that it was a not-too-clever plot by someone who's clearly a loser to wrest the prize from its rightful owner.
The true winner, who says she never heard of Ms. Rudner, swore her entry was original and was aghast at the idea of ripping off another person’s published work: "That's like breaking one of the Ten Commandments."
Age of the Fake
Sadly, not everyone who posts to Wikipedia is concerned with the Ten Commandments. Some are concerned with revenge. Some with self-aggrandizement. Some just have nothing better to do.
We live in an age of fake IDs, fake money, fake e-mails, fake URLs, fake IP addresses, and fake votes, where anyone can print or claim anything—or enter it in Wikipedia. But none of these frauds negate the value of Wikipedia. Nor do they mean that Jimmy Wales has to become the Internet's chief of police, because Wikipedia is working just the way it's supposed to.
Wikipedia entries are meant to be edited by members of the community. And in the long run, the truth will win out. Because the community, sooner or later, polices itself. And when it doesn't, it's the responsibility of those who are wrongly cited to correct the entry and/or out the spoiler.
It's Up to Us
Like it or not, it's your responsibility and mine to monitor what's being said about us online. We each have to make time for reputation management the same way we made time for e-mail, blogging, instant messaging, and the thousand other bits of information that interrupt, overload, educate, enlighten, annoy, captivate, scare, thrill, and delight us.
Wikipedia isn't the policeman of the Internet, nor could it be. Not even with 10,000 "fact checkers" and all the good intentions in the world.
So that brings it back to each of us. We have to pay attention, settle our own scores, and sadly, not always come out winners. Just like offline.
From the New York Times, March 3, 2007
DEAR [insert first name of preschool admissions director here],
We wanted to thank you for considering our daughter Bethanie for your 2’s program. We’ve enjoyed every step of the admissions process over these last six months — from the speed-dial excitement of the post-Labor Day calls for an application to camping out on the sidewalk overnight for the open house. We see it as a real testament to the strength of your program that 98 percent of your spots for next year will be filled with siblings. And, since we’re a glass-half-full kind of family, [insert preschool name here] is absolutely our first and only choice for Bethanie.
Given that there are probably 20 other Bethanys applying for the 2’s program next year, we wanted to point out that our daughter’s name is spelled Bethanie, with an ie not a y, after her paternal grandmother, Bethanie Beezley, an unsung teacher’s aide under Maria Montessori, who was evidently quite instrumental in developing the theory of the moderately gifted child. We hope this little tidbit about our family’s abiding commitment to progressive education helps clarify things on your end administratively.
The open house was spectacular! We were so impressed to hear your current 3-year-olds articulating your mission and responding to all those complex questions about your lottery, endowment and zoning issues and how they had an impact on the inspired vertical layout of your playground.
Please know that my husband was only kidding when he asked whether Deloitte & Touche oversaw the lottery drawing. Being selected to attend the parent tour was really meaningful for us. Not just because it was the first time in ages that we had done something together outside of couple’s counseling, but because we learned a lot about our values as parents.
The real aha! moment for us came during the playdate portion when we got to witness your school’s philosophy on conflict resolution. We so appreciated the teachers encouraging our Bethanie to use her “angry words” to describe having to put away her Polly Pocket and that other Bethany, with a y, to use her “hurt words” to voice how disappointed she was about the rip in her Dora sweatshirt. Needless to say, we’re grateful to have some new language to use at home.
You’ll notice that we included two birthdates on our application. Bethanie, who was born in April, will technically be 2.5 years old next September, but because she was eight weeks premature — I attribute this to trying to balance my job as a television producer with my volunteer work in Bosnia — she should really have been born in June, which would qualify her for your younger 2’s class. Whichever date you’re comfortable considering is fine with us. We’re flexible.
We are also wondering if it’s too late to be considered under your diversity category as a nontraditional family. Bill has just been cleared for his gender reassignment surgery — that’s right, Bethanie will soon have two moms — so we felt it important to bring this change in family constellation to your attention.
And, since we’re putting all our cards on the table, please know that while we originally left the sibling question blank, we do have a dozen embryos on ice at our fertility clinic. Given the current political climate, we hope you interpret this information however best works in our favor.We’d also like to request your scholarship form due to changes in our economic circumstances. We hadn’t anticipated needing to take a leave of absence from our jobs to attend the required open houses, parental tours and interviews.
We want to reiterate how strongly we hope Bethanie will attend [insert preschool name here]. In fact, we plan to home school Bethanie should she not be accepted. We’ll apply again the next year and the year after that, and perhaps even hold Bethanie back from kindergarten in hopes of having another opportunity to join your wonderful community.
Sincerely yours,
Jane and Bill (a k a Maria) Smith
P.S. We hope your staff enjoys the enclosed monogrammed Tiffany key rings. (We’re just sorry we couldn’t find everyone’s middle initials on Google.)
Former Denverite Karen Quinn again looks at NYC life
Karen Quinn is back in the fast lane.
She's the Denver alum who wrote the hit chick-lit book "The Ivy Chronicles." Now she's out with "Wife in the Fast Lane."
Quinn's the daughter of the late Sonny Nedler, owner of Sonny's on Fillmore jewelry in Cherry Creek North.
"Ivy" was a hit in 2005, the story of NYC kids getting into exclusive kindergartens. Catherine Zeta-Jones bought it to star in it, bringing her "Ocean's Twelve" producer, Jerry Weintraub, on board along with Warner Bros. It's due out in 2008.
"Wife in the Fast Lane" already has been published in England, where "Ivy" was a huge hit. It comes to the USA next month, and Quinn hits the Tattered Cover Colfax with the tome March 15.
Quinn explains that the book's about "a woman in the Upper East Side of Manhattan, very accomplished, married to this very successful man - when all of a sudden she inherits the granddaughter of the housekeeper she's had for many years. That kind of puts her over the edge."
Quinn and her husband and kids live in NYC, way downtown. So she knows the territory. Still, she likes to get back to Denver to see her family - and a lot of friends she left behind before she began her life in the fast lane.
Denver Post, 02/20/2007
Are You a Hectic, Super-Busy Woman? Enter Author Karen Quinn's "Wife in the Fast Lane One-Liner Contest"
Since I'm a journalist, I often get approached by PR firms or people who want me to write an article. From time to time, a story idea really catches my fancy. One recent pitch did just that.
If you're a hectic, fast-paced and super-busy woman, you may enjoy entering an off-beat, fun Wife in the Fast Lane Contest.
This contest basically is a very clever marketing gimmick -- I'm impressed! -- to promote the upcoming novel, Wife in the Fast Lane, from bestselling author Karen Quinn.
Anyhow, if you're a time-strapped, hurried wife, you're invited to submit a sassy, clever one-liner, essay or video all about what your life in the fast lane is like. If you win, you could get one of dozens of prizes, including a $2,000 gift certificate to Canyon Ranch Spa and a 14K gold charm bracelet. (Nice!)
Enter the contest here. Your deadline is February 16, 2007.
Now here comes the fun part. You get to hear how some busy women have been describing their fast-lane lives. Here's what they say: I knew I was living in the fast lane when:
* "My husband asked me what my favorite sexual fantasy was and I told him, `You making love to me without waking me up.'"
* "My three-year-old daughter insisted on calling her playroom her `office.'"
* "I was talking on the phone and forgot whom I was talking to and why we were talking."
* "I returned from one too many business trips and my three-year-old greeted me as `Aunt Mom.'"
* "I surprised my son by picking him up at school and his first question was, `Did my nanny die?'" Read more funny quips and one-liners.
Karen Quinn's new book, Wife in the Fast Lane, will be published on March 13, 2007 by Simon & Schuster. This newest novel is the follow-up to her national bestseller, The Ivy Chronicles (soon to be released as a major motion picture).
In Wife in the Fast Lane, Karen revisits the harried and often unintentionally hilarious world of the working woman extraordinaire who struggles to manage a career, husband, kids, school, business and more, all while keeping her sanity in check.
Publisher's Weekly called Wife in the Fast Lane "a delightful story" that's "good fun up to its happy ending!"
OK, I'm getting really inspired. Check back here for the upcoming..... drum roll, please.... SUGAR SHOCK! One-Liner Contest! Thanks, Karen, for the fabulous idea!
Sugarshockblog.com, Feb. 4 2007
Idle Time For Drivers of Rich Toddlers
We thought of one thing after reading the NY Times article about 92nd Street Y nursery school students' drivers clogging up the streets outside the school: Home schooling. Actually, we also thought "congestion tax," but reading about chauffeured SUVs for tiny children would drive most anyone crazy.
The competitive (which also means prestigious) 92nd Street Y Nursery School sent out a letter to parents warning them that if their cars still caused gridlock, then their kids' chances of getting into the 92nd Street Y's other private school programs might be compromised. Now, that is what we call a threat! The NY Times observed this much:
Over the course of four mornings this winter, at least 22 chauffeured S.U.V.'s were seen, most of them repeatedly, waiting in front of the school while parents brought in their children. Most of the cars belonged to families who live between Lexington and Fifth Avenues and 70th to 86th Streets. Subsequent research found that an overwhelming majority of the fathers in these families earn a living in the field of capital management — running money for hedge funds or private equity funds — though there was one television executive and one professional athlete.
Many of the mothers say that the chauffeured SUVs are necessary for errands and because they live far away - like on the Upper West Side (god forbid the child go to a school on the Upper West Side!). There's some suggestion that there are security concerns, but most suspect there's a competition over kids getting dropped off in style. We don't know what to say, except that the Armageddon will come when these kids have to dropped off in those horrible stretch Humvee limos.
And on the topic of nursery school insanity, we interviewed author and former nursery school admissions consultant Karen Quinn two years ago; she said, "I once heard about a father who put on a twenty-slide PowerPoint presentation pitching the advantages of his family and child over other applicants during a parent interview."
The Gothamist,
January 24, 2007
Mommy Lit
December 23, 2006
I normally read non-fiction books, but I made a decision to read more fiction "brain candy" for 2007. Soon after making that decision, Touchstone-Fireside sent me a few chick lit books (featuring moms) to preview. In the last week, I have read two of the three books.
I loved the first book, Wife in the Fast Lane by Karen Quinn, the author of the previous bestselling book, The Ivy Chronicles. This book was so great that I stayed up until 3 in the morning one night finishing it. The book is a about a woman named Christy Hayes, a former two-time Olympic gold medalist who over the course of the book runs a multi-billion dollar athletic shoe business, marries a rich, handsome husband and becomes the guardian of her housekeeper's granddaughter. That's the nice part. On the dark side, she faces a corporate takeover (by her best friend!); endures Manhattan private school craziness and catches her husband in a compromising position with another woman. Of course, since this is a novel, everything ties up nicely at the end. The good thing about this book (that makes it more than brain candy to me) is that it really made me think about the various choices that women make in our quest to "have it all"…the husband, the kids and the career. It also made me think how important it is for me to keep the "spice" in my relationship with my husband. (You'll understand after you read the book.) I highly recommend this book which should be out in stores in March of 2007.
http://www.mominthecity.com/blog/
Mom gets schooled in college panic
By Catherine Mallette
McClatchy Newspapers
Sometimes, as a parent, I find myself doing things that I know are absolutely crazy, and yet I still do them.
I can tell you right now that in the next year and a half, I am going to go down all kinds of nonsensical paths because my son Jack is a high-school junior, and I am already sucking myself into College Admissions Insanity, as "Time" magazine reporters so aptly described the process in last week's cover story, "Who Needs Harvard?"
I know better than to panic. I know because I've panicked twice before about school choices for this same kid, and the panicking was a total waste of time.
First there was The Preschool Panic. All my mom-friends were in the same mode of not-so-quiet desperation, worrying about how the heck to get our 3- and 4-year-olds into the right preschools - the ones that were considered feeder schools to the best private elementary schools. I know I am not the only idiot who wasted his or her time on this because I've read "The Ivy Chronicles," a hilarious novel about a Manhattan mom who starts a consulting business, helping (for enormous sums of money) high-strung parents get their tots into the city's top preschools. Sure, it was a novel, but it rang true. It wasn't quite that bad in Dallas, where I lived, but the panic was there, and I succumbed to it.
I did it because I wanted the very best for my child. I worried that if Jack didn't have this opportunity, I'd be slamming closed doors of further opportunity for him for the rest of his life.
So Jack went to one of those top-rated schools, and it turned out to be a bit of disaster. After three years of nothing but "He's doing fine!" reports, my then-husband and I were told one spring that Jack would not be promoted to first grade, that he was way behind on his reading skills and that he really didn't have any friends because no one could understand his speech. The school's solution? Put him back in another year of kindergarten.
What we did instead was to sign Jack up for speech therapy. We learned that some early ear infections had caused him to miss developing crucial building blocks of speech. The phonics-only approach to reading that his preschool had taken was completely ineffective for Jack because he couldn't "hear" the sounds of some letters, even though his hearing was perfectly fine.
Within a month, he was reading. And within a month, we'd decided to enroll him in our local public school for kindergarten, where reading was taught both phonetically and in a whole-word approach, so Jack would do just fine. And he did. And I grew to love that public school.
My passion for the private school had been totally misplaced. It just wasn't right for my child at that particular time.
Which leads me to the End of Elementary Panic, another difficult era. Again, my mom-friends (all of us on the PTA board at the public school) were in the same boat. We all loved our school - but would we love the local junior high school? Families began peeling away from our elementary school, choosing private schools and causing all kinds of bitter feelings for those of us "left behind." Again, I thought I knew what I wanted. I loved public school.
And then, in the spring of Jack's sixth-grade year, we toured some private schools and the local junior high, and I realized that I was wrong again. In the classes I attended at the public school, very little learning was going on. In one class, child after child gave an oral book report on the same novel while no one listened. In another, the kids did absolutely nothing while the teacher went around the room to talk with them individually about their grades on some project.
It just wasn't right for my child at that particular time. My "I forgot about my semester-long science project until the last day of school" child needed more teacher attention, more prodding.
What I should have learned from all this is that finding the right school is a process. As the article in "Time" said, "College is a match to be made, not a prize to be won." And yet. And yet.
I bought a copy of the voluminous "Barron's Profiles of American Colleges" and went through it this summer, sticking Post-It notes on colleges I thought might be good for my son. Jack thought I was nuts.
"Mom, I haven't even taken the PSAT yet," he pointed out.
He was right, of course. I was jumping the gun. Finding the right school for a kid isn't like buying a new vacuum cleaner, where you look at "Consumer Reports" and then pick the one that's ranked the highest.
What matters right now is the now - the things Jack has control over. Studying for the PSAT. Making good grades in school. Using his free time in constructive ways. Attending cross-country practice. And as the year goes on, we'll start gathering college information and continue the process of self-appraisal and finding a good match.
And yet, and yet.
My own high-strung tendencies run deep, and every time I see a story like the one in "Time", I fret that I am not doing enough "right now" to move this process forward.
For example, do you know what I did as soon as I finished reading that "Time" story, even though the whole point of the article was to show that parental College Admissions Insanity may be misplaced?
I popped the CD that came with the "Barron's" book into my computer and started a search of potential colleges for Jack. Hmmm, what about Emory?
Let the Insanity begin.
Nursery Nightmares
Congratulations, you survived the harrowing process of getting your child into a top NYC nursery school. And, may we say, that spiffy new straightjacket looks absolutely fetching on you!
THE GUN GOES OFF AT 7:30 A.M. THE DAY AFTER LABOR DAY.
Frenzied parents jam phone lines to request nursery school applications—some manning four lines at one time—and there are schools that run out of applications by noon.
Winning your prodigy a spot in a top Manhattan nursery school is blood sport, as billionaires, millionaires, and the city's biggest celebs—along with the rest of us—go for spots like sharks after chum.
The process was never easy in the past, but it's become even harder since the baby boom that came in the wake of 9/11. The only way to earn a place at a prized preschool—and the privilege of paying about $12,000 to $25,000 for a two-day-per-week program for your pre-K tot—is to tackle the admissions process wholeheartedly.
Some start the race before unsuspecting offspring can swallow whole food, sending their babies and toddlers to parenting programs and play groups that are deemed “feeders to the feeders,” many of which have up to one-year waiting lists. These pre-preschool programs, like Madison Playgroup, Free to Be Under Three at All Souls, Barnard Toddler Program, and the Parenting Center at Central Synagogue, help one- and two-year-olds learn to socialize, share, and play nicely so they can ace their nursery school interviews.
But, is it worth all the Sturm und Drang?
Do you have a phd in the abcs?
The qualitative differences between nurseries citywide lie not so much in their varying philosophies, but in what the top-tier schools have that all the others don't.
All the “baby ivies” have the following things in common: directors with 20-plus years in early childhood education, fabulous facilities, students with famous parents, teachers with masters' degrees, expertly thought-out programs, strong track records for sending their graduates to all the best public and private schools in town—and, of course, impossible admissions.
ATTACK OF THE KILLER APPLICATION PROCESS
The key to getting into a tippy-top-tier nursery is having a balanced, well-thought-out list of schools to apply to (typically, no less than six and no more than 12 is a good number). The best lists include a few baby ivies, a few schools that are reasonable reaches, and a few more that are pretty much pay and go, known as “safeties.”
One ultrasuccessful, überzealous Upper East Side couple—attractive, articulate, creative people with a delicious two-year-old daughter—scored big this year, claiming two baby-ivy acceptances. The mother admits that even though the horrific ordeal took over her life—by December, she'd become completely unglued—she'd do it all over again. “It plays with your mind,” she says of the process. “It takes the most confident person and brings you to your knees; it's so humbling. But you'll do anything for your child.”
This competitive, competent mother, who has climbed up the corporate ladder, was completely blindsided. “You don't think that a little nursery school admissions process could cause even a hiccup in your life,” she says. Yet she got so wrapped up in it that she wasn't able to concentrate on big business deals at work. “It was an emotional roller coaster that was completely draining. My mind became consumed with writing letters, preparing for all kinds of interviews, and writing essays, all to get my daughter into the best possible school.”
The baby-ivy alumni network in New York City is as storied as its schools. Although no one actually lists their nursery school on their resume, the one you or your child attended comes up commonly over cocktails. Attendance at a hot nursery connotes social status and academic prowess—conveniently cloaked in the interest of doing what's best for junior, of course.
HOW WAS I TO KNOW ASTROPHYSICS WOULDN'T BE YOUR FORTE? NOW FINISH YOUR HOMEWORK!
In addition to schools that offer only nursery programs, there are also those that start with nursery programs and go up to grades eight, nine, or 12. These “ongoing” schools—such as Horace Mann, Town School, and Trevor Day—maintain nursery divisions primarily as a service to their community, so most spots are taken by the children or siblings of students and alumni, further enhancing the feeling of family within the school and bolstering the bottom line in the Headmaster's Circle.
The caveat in choosing a nursery program that's part of an ongoing school is that one may prove too rigorous for your child down the road, while another may not be challenging enough. It's hard to determine whether the school that's right for your two-year-old will be the best fit for her all the way through middle and high school. Also, many early-childhood education experts agree that ongoing schools with nursery programs aren't as strong as their nursery-only counterparts, as their focus can be diluted due to greater programming or capital agendas. Hence, roughly a dozen years ago, Dalton lopped off its nursery program and hasn't looked back.
Today, private nurseries are sending their “graduates” on to a wider variety of ongoing schools, both public and private. You can check my book, The Manhattan Directory of Private Nursery Schools (Soho Press; $29), to get a good idea of where a particular nursery is sending its students for kindergarten (never ask while touring or interviewing). The more ongoing schools listed under the “graduates” category, the better; it means the nursery school director has forged relationships with admissions directors at more ongoing schools, thus increasing your odds at the next level, kindergarten.
"DO-IT-YOURSELF ROOT CANAL" AND OTHER REALLY BAD IDEAS
If you haven't the foggiest idea how to compose a solid list of schools, then it's time to hire an advisor. Amanda Uhry, of Manhattan Private School Advisors, is convinced that clueless parents should get help—or the results could be disastrous.
“They'll soon see it's like trying to do their own root canal,” Uhry says. “It's painful, and they won't realize they did it wrong until it's too late in the process to fix the mess.” For $8,000 to $10,000, her company offers unlimited meetings, phone calls, e-mails, and help writing application essays and “first choice letters.” All aspects of both parent and child interview-preparation are covered, and clients are provided with an analysis of each nursery school they're interested in, including demographics, which schools its grads have moved on to for the past five years, a view of the school from every angle, and an opportunity to speak with parents of current students.
In an arena where there are typically no guarantees, Uhry makes a promise to panic-stricken parents: “If your child isn't accepted the year we're working with you, the next year is free. But,” she adds proudly, “it hasn't happened once. Our record is 100 percent acceptance to all parents' top three preschools since 2002.”
(Other advisors tend to offer more flexible rates, roughly $400 to $4,000, depending on what's needed.)
BITE ME AGAIN, SALLY, AND I'LL KEEP YOUR KEISTER OUT OF KINDERGARTEN, TOO
Is all this extra help overpriced? No way, say the advisors, who have to deal with so many type-A parents that they end up having a higher burnout rate than the nursery school directors and teachers themselves.
Karen Quinn, a former advisor, quit the business when one child she was coaching declared, “Stop! Can't you see I'm only four?” Quinn then wrote the charming, satirical novel The Ivy Chronicles (Viking Adult; $23.95) based on her myriad over-the-top experiences.
Quinn always gave her clients 200 percent, she says, and while many met with resounding success, there were always some who just didn't make the cut—and then, watch out. For example, occasionally a client's child blew an interview. “This could be caused by anything from biting another child, to stealing a toy, to pooping in their Pampers, to entirely melting down in the presence of an admissions director,” Quinn says. And afterwards? “The result was usually multiple strategy sessions with parents that were insane. I mean, what do you do? If it was a bite, do you pretend it never happened? Explain that this was an errant bite? Try to justify the bite in some way by maligning the bitee?” Quinn and the parents would consider their options; and though Quinn knew the biter would never get into that school, she also knew it was best never to mention the fateful incident again.
One crazy client, sitting nearby while Quinn conducted a weekly prep session on colors, was informed that her son had passed out. “He had put his head down on my dining room table and fallen asleep,” says Quinn. “I told his mother, ‘You'd better take him home,' but she just said, ‘Oh, no, keep talking, he'll get it subliminally!'”
Other advisors find the grind of listening to stressed-out parents entirely too taxing and time-consuming. Nina Bauer, of top advisory firm Ivy Wise, announced her “retirement” this year after giving birth to her second child, and it's up in the air whether she'll return to the scene. Other advisors confess to “losing” cell phones, or traveling to places where there's “no cell service” to get breaks from all the bitching and bellyaching.
BUT THEY'RE THE RICHEST KIDS IN PUBLIC SCHOOL, THERE'S SOMETHING TO BE SAID FOR THAT
Then there's the worst nursery nightmare of all.
"L'Affaire Grubman-Weill," as it's known, occurred in 2002. Sandy Weill, a Citigroup kingpin, was also a board member of the 92nd Street Y (where he'd recently donated $1 million). One day he asked top stock analyst Jack Grubman to “take another look” at ATT, a stock that Citigroup was offering, but which had received a low rating that displeased Weill. The rating was changed, Citigroup sold tons of ATT, and—lo and behold—Grubman's twins landed a pair of nursery school spots.
Then Attorney General Eliot Spitzer took a closer look—and didn't like what he saw. Grubman got a permanent time-out (he was barred from the industry), fines flew, and the twins didn't fare so well, either. In the next round of admissions, kindergarten, they ended up in public school, reportedly not the Grubmans' first choice at the time.
DEAR MS. STERNBUTT, I SO ENJOYED THE GRAHAM CRACKERS AND FRUIT PUNCH YOU SERVED AT OUR LAST MEETING
Bottom line: You must be prepared not only to have a well-behaved, healthy, smart, good-looking child (no, sadly, that's not enough), but also to ace application essays, tour endless schools, attend scores of open houses, endure interviews, write well-written, thoughtful thank-you notes, use connections (if you have them), and, after reviewing all the options (usually sometime in mid-February), write an outstanding “first choice letter” indicating your desire to enroll if accepted.
Then all you'll need is a smile from the gods and the assets of the Rockefellers, and nursery school fortune will be yours.
Victoria Goldman, Gotham Magazine
September 2006
Lie,
Cheat, Beg or Sue
Academy
X
By Andrew Trees
Bloomsbury USA; hardcover
Glamorous
Disasters
By Eliot Schrefer
Simon & Schuster; hardcover
Jane
Austen in Scarsdale;
or Love, Death and the SAT’s
By Paula Marantz Cohen
St. Martin’s Press; hardcover
THE
most unpopular teacher in New York City this
summer is probably Andrew Trees, a 37-year-old
who teaches history at Horace Mann School. Mr.
Trees is the author of “Academy X,”
a satiric novel about a private school so deeply
in the throes of college-admissions hysteria
that roughly a third of the students are pretending
to have learning disabilities so they can get
more time on the SAT’s.
As
a publicity stunt, the author adopted the pseudonym
so beloved by 19th-century pornographers, “Anonymous,”
and he outed himself only shortly before publication,
in June, whereupon many with close ties to private
schools accused him of being a turncoat. “I
think this is the biggest self-righteous, arrogant
traitor walking the face of the earth,”
Victoria Goldman, a board member of the nearby
Riverdale Country School, told The New York
Sun. Riverdale is one of several schools now
looking into nondisclosure clauses in employee
contracts.
In
truth, Academy X doesn’t particularly
resemble Horace Mann or any other school. All
we learn about it is that it has the city’s
only indoor croquet court, and that if you have
to ask what kind of place it is, then your child
would never get in to begin with. And the novel
is less a pedagogical exposé, in the
tradition of, say, Dickens’s “Hard
Times,” than it is the latest example
of admissions lit — a new genre about
the great rat race of getting your children
into the right schools.
Another
recent example is “Glamorous Disasters,”
about an SAT tutor in New York City who is paid
$395 an hour to raise the scores of the spoiled
and overprivileged. In this case the author,
a Harvard graduate who used to work for a tutoring
outfit called Advantage Testing, goes by his
own name, Eliot Schrefer, and if he hasn’t
yet been vilified as much as Mr. Trees, it’s
doubtless because his former clients would just
as soon not call attention to themselves.
The
parents in this novel, haughty, neglectful,
ambitious, are even more vicious and corrupt
than those in “Academy X.” One of
them even offers the protagonist $80,000 to
take the SAT in his son’s place.
In
one way or another, in fact, parents behaving
badly is the real subject of admissions lit.
The children, no matter how lazy, druggy or
just plain dumb, turn out to be the hapless
victims of rich, predatory parents who treat
the education of their offspring as a sort of
social blood sport and will do anything —
lie, cheat, grovel, sue — to get an advantage.
Staggering amounts of money get tossed around
as bribe bait, as well as Knicks tickets and
promises of sex.
Nor
is the struggle confined to getting into college.
The most intense competition, to judge from
some other novels, takes place over kindergarten
slots. For example, in “The Ivy Chronicles”
(Viking; 2005), one family toasts their underperforming
5-year-old in a tanning salon and changes her
name to WaShaunté in hopes of gaining
some diversity points. (The author, Karen Quinn,
ran a pre-school admissions-advice service until
she burned out from stress.)
Nancy
Lieberman’s “Admissions” (Warner
Books; 2004), in many ways the best of these
novels, benefits from being about a K-8 school,
which means that there are two admissions cycles
taking place simultaneously, one to cull precocious,
well-connected kindergartners and one to move
the graduating eighth graders on to Dalton,
Brearly or wherever. The key to both processes
is the demented, dictatorial headmistress, Ms.
Rothchild, and smart parents know that the best
way to appease Ms. Rothchild is to subsidize
her friend’s cooking school in Provence.
Another
recurring motif in admissions lit is, oddly,
Jane Austen. She turns up explicitly in Paula
Marantz Cohen’s “Jane Austen in
Scarsdale; or Love, Death and the SAT’s,”
a novel that takes a fairly benign view of the
admissions process and is thus the blandest
and wimpiest of these books, though it does
have a keen ear for what makes a truly bad personal
essay: “When I was a baby at my mother’s
knee, I did not have goals, aspirations or dreams.
Like a puppy, I rolled and tumbled, knowing
no reason or purpose for my actions. However,
as I grew, I began to aspire more. I began to
study and question. In time a dream began to
take shape. That dream was to go to Bowdoin
(Antioch, Bard, Middlebury, etc.).”
But
Austen is also a touchstone in “Academy
X,” where the students slog through “Emma”
and keep confusing the characters with the actors
who played them in the movie, and all the books
are propelled by an Austenian subplot, in which
the protagonist — the teacher, tutor,
guidance counselor, adviser — is lonely
and broke and looking for both a mate and a
decent income, if not a fortune. You wouldn’t
be in the admissions racket, the message seems
to be, if you really had a life.
These
lovelorn commoners are also stand-ins for the
reader, and it’s through their sometimes
envious eyes that we get to take part in that
always fashionable literary enterprise, marveling
at the excesses and abandon of the rich. In
a couple of these books there is as much apartment
porn (breathless descriptions of Fifth Avenue
penthouses and “classic sevens”
on Park) as there is porn of the other variety.
We
also get to disapprove and to feel superior,
of course, secure in the knowledge that even
if we could afford to, we would never stoop
to brainwashing our pre-schoolers for an assessment
test or donating a sum equivalent to the budget
of a third-world country just to get our daughters
into what “Admissions” calls The
Very Brainy Girls’ School.
Readers
of these books who don’t happen to live
in Manhattan or in Westchester County (which
in Ms. Marantz Cohen’s version is only
slightly less of an educational hothouse) can
take additional pleasure in knowing that they
don’t have to put themselves through this
particular wringer.
For
readers closer to home, fretting over the odds
at Spence, say, compared with those at Chapin
or Nightingale, the novels work a little like
horror stories; by giving vent to our worst
nightmares they both excite and reassure us.
At
the end of these books, everyone gets in somewhere,
even if the parents divorce each other in the
process.
—Charles
McGrath, New York Times
7/30/2006 |
|
Whither
Devil Wears Prada? Writers Weigh In
What
with The Devil Wears Prada opening
last Friday, we put a call out to some of our
writer friends to see if they were going to
catch the adaptation of Lauren Weisberger's
novel over the long weekend. "It's much
like the book in that it's a light and fun piece,"
says Karen Quinn, author of The Ivy Chronicles.
"I thought Meryl Streep did a better job
of making Miranda a more nuanced and sympathetic
character than she was in the book." Rachel
Pine (right), who jokes that The Twins of
Tribeca sold "about one million fewer
copies" than Prada, agrees: "The
movie successfully addressed an area that was
missing from the novel. Quite simply, you don't
get to be an Anna Wintour or a Miranda Priestley
or a Harvey Weinstein without being really damn
good at what you do. The novel never gave Anna/Miranda
credit for being anything other than a nasty,
demanding boss. The film portrays her as a woman
who understands her industry the way any other
business leader understands theirs."
Joshilyn
Jackson (left), who's gearing up for the release
of her second novel (Between, Georgia),
wasn't entirely comfortable with the roman
a clef aspects of Weisberger's novel ("the
whole idea makes me uncomfortable; it's a get-out-of-slander
free card"), but "I would watch a
movie called Meryl Streep Makes Soup,
so I went with a bunch of girls and we ate a
despicable amount of popcorn. Meryl Streep was
note perfect—alert the presses—and
I am liking that Anne Hathaway more and more.
I paid eight bucks hoping to be entertained
for an hour and forty six minutes, and I got
every penny's worth."
Andi
Buchanan (right), who took a break from the
tail end of her tour for It's a Girl: Women
Writers on Raising Daughters to watch the
movie, wasn't as impressed. "It was bad,
bad, bad," she reports. "I was thinking
it was a bad book that might make a good movie...and
I was thinking that even if the movie wasn't
great, it might be the kind of thing that could
be so bad it's good....but, sadly, all of those
thoughts were wrong. As my friend Becca said,
'Given how bad the book was, I didn't think
it possible to say the movie didn't live up
to the book, but it didn't. Though the one thing
the movie did match the book in was tedium.'"
Weisberger's
college buddy Deborah Schoeneman (left) (4%
Famous) dubs the film "a surefire
summer hit." She elaborates, "While
other bestselling books about Manhattan—Bright
Lights, Big City, American Psycho, and
Slaves of New York—fell relatively
flat as movies, Devil works better
on the big screen. The fashion world setting
made the story cinematic, even though Patricia
Field created some puzzling outfits. Why would
Miranda and her assistants all wear all black
to the big gala? Not when they have every designer
vying to dress them. Newsboy caps? Not at Condé
Nast."
"Despite
the fact that both the book and the movie are
about clothes and clothes are for the most part
dumb, Patricia Field is a brilliant stylist,"
says Stephanie Lessing (right), who took a break
from going over the final proofs for her new
novel, Miss Understanding, to check
out the film. "So brilliant I would, if
forced, allow her to dress me, too. And therein
lies the greater appeal of the movie as opposed
to the book: The book doesn't come close to
showcasing the impressive collection of clothes
and accessories that appear on screen. Not to
mention the most amazing make-up applications
on the entire planet." Some of Stephanie's
favorite highlights follow...
- "The
green eye shadow preferred by the first assistant
was a real show stopper. So much so that I
hardly even remember who played the first
assistant. I would have never thought to do
such a thing in an office setting, but such
is life at Vogue, I mean Runway. Killer, seriously."
- "The
round Chanel handbag with the big number on
it. That was a cool bag by any standards;
coupled with Andy's head-to-toe Chanel ensemble,
it was actually too distracting in its outfitty-ness.
Her clothes were wearing her in that scene:
Big no no. I'm surprised Patricia Fields didn't
have the sense to rip Anne Hathaway's stockings
or something to give Andy a bit of an edge.
Still, the pocketbook was to die for. It could
have been its own movie."
- "The
green coat with the black button that Andy
wears when she first starts dressing like
a fashion assistant. I might want that one
day. All I remember about that scene was something
about a subway."
- "The
black power suit that Andy wears when Nigel
tells her he landed a new job; the detail
on that jacket was impeccable, so impeccable
that I doubt anyone cared or not if Nigel
got the job. I liked the slightly puffed sleeve
and the deep, scooped neck with the plunging
portrait collar. And because Nigel liked it
too, it was the one time I really felt as
though Nigel and I had the potential to become
friends. Otherwise I thought he was a total
bitch. But that jacket—Oh. My. God."
- "That
black dress Andy wore when they were hanging
out in Paris. The one with the full skirt
that wasn't too full because it had that top
layer of raised embroidery that kept it in
place. That dress floored me. I would so buy
it. I mean if I cared."
As
for the more traditionally significant aspects
of a motion picture, like plot and characters,
Stephanie shrugs, "The book wasn't funny
either, but at least the book wasn't trying
to be funny. Right?"
—Mediabistro.com
7/5/2006 |
|
Skinny
Jeans
A
few weeks ago my best friend, on her way back
to Los Angeles from London, via New York, came
into town with a mission: to buy skinny jeans.
"Everyone in London is wearing them,"
she hissed over her plate of ravioli at Fred's,
the ninth floor restaurant in Barneys. "I
felt so stupid in my boot cuts."
So
after lunch we took the elevator down one floor
and made a beeline for the denim display. My
friend plucked half a dozen pairs off the tables
and shelves and charged into one of the dressing
rooms. A couple of minutes later she emerged
and took a long look in the full-length mirror
near the entrance of the changing rooms.
"These
are horrible," she whispered, pressing
in the sides of her child-bearing hips (she
gave birth seven months ago and is still working
off the baby weight) and biting back tears.
They
may be the hottest thing in designer denim,
adopted by the cutting edge a year ago and now
filtering down to the rest of the world, but
the skinny jean is a complicated real-life proposition.
Unlike
the flare and the boot cut, which balance a
thicker thigh or wider hip with extra volume
at the lower leg, the tapered ankle of the skinny
jean only highlights those figure flaws. Even
ultra-slim novelist Plum Sykes urges caution.
The jeans, she says, "can only be worn
by extraordinary British fashion icons with
a rock-and-roll attitude. (They) look dreadful
on all other women".
Still,
premium denim designers insist the trend is
selling big and is here to stay.
Last
autumn, Ernest Sewn introduced its skinny tapered-leg
jean, called Harlan, and is offering the silhouette
in three additional washes. It's been so successful
that for next autumn, Scott Morrison, Earnest
Sewn's president and designer says, the company
has two more styles featuring an ankle zip and
an even slimmer-leg jean with a higher rise.
Meanwhile,
Seven for All Mankind is expanding their selection
of tapered jeans with new washes and ankle zips,
and Paris-based Notify has developed a two-wayor
"bi-stretch" for addedcomfort.
Buyers
are bullish on the skinny, too. Jacques Keledjian,
chief executive and owner of Intermix, a chain
of fashion-forward boutiques in the US, says
the 10-inch-rise skinny black jean from J Brand
has been "flying off the racks".
And
Barneys women's denim buyer Grace Kang says
the store has sold over 10,000 pairs of skinny
jeans since last autumn.
Of
course, it makes sense that after years of pushing
low-rise and boot-cut, denim manufacturers and
retailers would advocate a completely new silhouette
to keep people interested - and buying. As Marshal
Cohen, chief retail analyst for NPD Group, a
US-based market research firm, says: "Designers
are offering skinny leg jeans this season for
change. Without style change, the consumer has
little to motivate them to purchase new."
Cohen also estimates that the skinny jean, because
it appeals mainly to "the young and young
at heart, with a figure to wear them,"
will reach only 16 per cent of customers.
James
Shaffer, the designer behind the LA-based Blue
Tattoo fashion line, says skinny jeans account
for only 20 per cent of his denim production."I
can say from doing trade shows and discussing
with stores, there's an apprehension because
it's a hard fit on a lot of women. You basically
have to be long and lean," says Shaffer.
As
Notify's owner and designer Maurice Ohayon points
out: "In the 1950s the slim fits were glamorous
and sexy, emphasising the woman's body. In the
1980s, the skinny fits were linked to the punk
attitude. Today, the slim silhouette creates
a perfect androgynous look and is linked to
a masculine attitude rather than a sexy one."
According
to London-based Jennifer Kersis, the former
managing director of fashion line Jasmine di
Milo and head of NetJets's UK arm, she's spent
the last nine months practicallyliving in her
drainpipe jeans from H&M, but a few weeks
ago decided the silhouette "wasn't a novelty"
and invested in tapered leg pairs from Paige
Premium Denim and Imitation of Christ.
Her
favourite thing about them? They show off her
Alaia ankle boots. "A boot cut hangs over
and hides a beautiful shoe, which is a bit of
a shame," observes Kersis.
In
fact, choosing the right shoe seems to be the
key to wearing the skinny jean well. Boy-shaped
types can pull them off with flats, but everyone
else is better off pairing them with heels or
even more flattering, tucking them into tall
boots.
"A
curvy girl should wear them with slouchy boots
and a long tunic," says Kang.
Or
she could go for a pair of Radcliffe Denim's
skinny stretch jeans in black. UK-based designer
Suzy Radcliffe cuts her skinnys straight from
the knee so they're narrow over the calf but
not tight around the ankle, avoiding the hip-widening
effect.
Plus,
says Radcliffe, "with skinny jeans, darker
colours are more flattering because they make
the leg look much slimmer."
Variations
on the trend aside, Karen Quinn,
the author of bestseller The Ivy Chronicles
and the soon-to-be-released Wife in the
Fast Lane, has her own reason for embracing
the skinny jean. "Getting them on and off
is a workout in itself."
—Financial
Times
6/17/2006 |
|
Avoiding
'Super Sweets'
In
the MTV-era, the old proverb needs to read:
Spare the bling or spoil the child
After
Karen Quinn's 14-year-old daughter, Schuyler,
watched "My Super Sweet 16," MTV's
reality show about overindulged adolescents
and their hugely expensive birthday extravaganzas,
she asked her mother if she could have such
a party when she turned 16.
When
Karen explained that even if she and her husband
could afford such an affair, they would not
indulge her, Schuyler begged them to at least
cater a party for her at a hotel.
"You
don't even have to give me a car," she
told her mom.
Though,
in Schuyler's case, the issue was resolved with
an at-home dance party with pizza and deli platters;
for many other kids, shows like this one reinforce
a troubling sense of entitlement and contribute
to their being, well, spoiled.
"As
a working and often exhausted parent, I know
that it is easier to say 'yes' to our kids than
'no,'" says Quinn, a Tribeca resident and
the author of the novel "The Ivy Chronicles."
"But we aren't doing our children any favors
by just buying them everything they want."
Yet
many of us buy our precious darlings way more
than we ever had - and then feel annoyed with
them when they want more. Are kids today more
spoiled than we were?
"There
is more to be had out there today, and it is
more expensive than it used to be," says
Dr. Kevin Kalikow, a child psychiatrist and
clinical assistant professor of psychiatry at
Westchester Medical Center.
Things
like iPods, Razr cell phones and Abercrombie
jeans cost a lot more than most kids' allowances
for a month, so moms and dads wind up footing
the bill. And parents - guilty about not spending
more time with their kids - are often all too
happy to do so.
"We
have dual income households and parents who
are less available than they might have been
15 years ago," says Jennifer Hartstein,
child and adolescent psychologist at Montefiore
Medical Center in the Bronx. "Parents make
up for the lack of face-to-face time with their
kids by giving them things."
While
it's best to start setting firm limits on behavior
and possessions when your child is very young,
it's never too late to "unspoil" your
child. Here are some tips to keep your child
from acting like one of the "sweet"
kids on "My Super Sweet 16."
-
Insist that your child earns what he gets.
Even if he can't pay for the whole thing,
make him pay a portion. "Kids have to
demonstrate responsibility and show that they
have the right to own something," Hartstein
says. If your child doesn't make any money
baby-sitting or dog walking, pay him for doing
household chores.
- Set
limits and boundaries for your child, says
Joel Haber, a White Plains psychologist. "This
is healthy for children because it teaches
them the guidelines and expectations we have
for them, and it helps them to become more
empathetic with others and to see that they
can't have everything they want."
- Don't
be afraid to say no. Yes, your child will
scream that she hates you, and she probably
does, right at that moment. But instead of
engaging in a screaming match, validate her
feelings, Hartstein says. "Tell her,
'I see you are angry right now and I understand
why you are angry. I'm sorry that I can't
give you what you want right now, and I am
going to give you some time to be mad. Above
all, I want you to know that I still love
you.'"
- Develop
predictable rituals with your family, such
as eating dinner together. "Show your
love with consistency and predictability,"
Haber says, "and not by giving things.
Things are really important for about five
minutes and then they're not important anymore."
- Don't
think that your child is going to be a self-centered
little brat for the rest of his life. "Our
parents said the same thing about us and yet
most of us are responsible, self-sustaining
adults," Kalikow says. "Many of
the kids we see as spoiled will outgrow this
as they mature and get older."
—Rosemary
Black, The Daily News
6/3/2006 |
|
Is
This the 'Biggest Self-Righteous Arrogant Traitor'
Ever in School?
Students
aren't the only ones working on research projects
at some of the city's elite private schools.
A
history teacher at Horace Mann School in Riverdale
has used his intimate view of the city's movers
and shakers to pen a novel about a leafy campus
in New York City where 17-year olds drive Mercedes
cars, take prescription drugs to boost their
academic performance, and turn to seduction
and plagiarism to guarantee a slot in the Ivy
League.
"Academy
X" is hitting bookstores this week and
some parents are calling its author, Andrew
Trees, a regular Benedict Arnold.
"I
think this is the biggest self-righteous, arrogant
traitor walking the face of the earth,"
a member of the board of trustees at the nearby
Riverdale Country School, Victoria Goldman,
said. "He's sending up the entire community
that he works with, and that takes nerve."
The
city's private schools - where influential parents
battle for everything from better grades for
their children to asking federal judges to intervene
in disputes - are known to be tight-lipped when
it comes to what happens within their halls.
The head of school at Horace Mann and several
other administrators did not return numerous
calls seeking comment yesterday, and some teachers
also refused to talk about the book.
On
its copyright page, "Academy X" is
listed as being in the "Rich People - Fiction"
category. Tuition at the school is almost $30,000
a year. Celebrity parents at the school include
the state attorney general, Elliot Spitzer,
and an entertainment mogul, Sean "Diddy"
Combs.
To
build some buzz, the author was listed as anonymous
on early copies of the book. Mr. Trees's name
was added when Bloomsbury officially released
it.
In
a pre-emptive strike, Mr. Trees published a
letter to the Horace Mann community in the student
newspaper last week, alerting it to the imminent
release of his novel.
"My
goal in writing Academy X is simply to satirize
the follies that occur at virtually every elite
private - and many public - high schools these
days, particularly the insanity that accompanies
the college admission process," he wrote.
The protagonist of the novel, John Spencer,
is an English teacher who struggles to teach
Jane Austen, but is often distracted by the
students' "exposed thongs and butt-skimming
skirts." A high-maintenance parent tries
to bully him to boost a grade to A-minus from
B-plus, while another sets him up in a rent-stabilized
apartment on the Upper West Side.
In
an interview yesterday, Mr. Trees, 37, said
that in his five years as a history teacher
at Horace Mann he noticed a lot of "entertaining
things that would make a good story."
"The
book is a novel. It's not meant to be Horace
Mann, but it definitely draws on my experiences
here," he said.
As
a graduate of the Deerfield Academy, a boarding
school in Massachusetts, Mr. Trees is no stranger
to the world of the wealthy. He also received
a degree from Princeton and a doctorate in history
from the University of Virginia. The onslaught
of tell-all books about the children who reside
in the city's wealthiest zip codes and the people
who educate them has some schools now talking
about asking teachers to sign nondisclosure
forms.
"The
Nanny Diaries," which centers on nannies
dealing with the city's wealthy 4-year-olds,
kicked off the slew of books. The most recent
additions include "Glamorous Disasters,"
a novel by a 27-year-old Harvard graduate, Eliot
Schrefer, about an Upper East Side SAT tutor
who rakes in $395 apiece to boost the scores
of 16-year-olds. In "The Ivy Chronicles,"
author Karen Quinn takes readers inside the
insane world of what parents will do to get
their tots into kindergarten.
Mr.
Trees called himself an "equal opportunity
satirist" who makes fun of parents, teachers,
and students. So far, he says that the head
of school is laughing along with him. "His
reaction has been supportive. I know that he's
concerned about what people will say about it,
but he told me that he thought the book was
funny," Mr. Trees said.
If
the book generates problems for Horace Mann,
Mr. Trees said he might be out of a job. Other
private school principals said they couldn't
believe that he would be invited back.
"As
far as I know, I'm still coming back to teach,"
Mr. Trees said. "To be honest about it,
clearly not everybody at school is happy about
the book. I'm hopeful that once the book comes
out and people read it, it will be fine."
In
the meantime he has at least a few supporters.
"Some parents are fulfilling a fantasy
life through their children," a parent
at Horace Mann who asked not to be identified
said about the book release. "Some parents
are embarrassingly over-involved and become
stereotypes of themselves. So many of them are
drooping with money and want everybody to know
it."
—Deborah
Kolben, The New York Sun
5/19/2006 |
|
When
Something’s Not Quite Right
Some
meaningful questions include: “Is my kid
comfortable in class?” “Can they
stand still or wait in line?” “Do
you see growth?” “Are there separation
issues?”
Just
because your child experiences a blip in development
doesn’t necessarily mean he or she needs
special education. “Take baby steps,”
one early childhood teacher advised. “But,
trust your instincts. If there’s consistent
trouble, talk to your teacher.”
According
to this teacher, starting at square one is a
big thing and asking teachers good questions
is the right way to begin. Some meaningful questions
include: “Is my kid comfortable in class?”
“Can they stand still or wait in line?”
“Do you see growth?” “Are
there separation issues?”
The
extent of trouble depends — and there’s
a wide spectrum. Among the problems: behavioral,
neurological, academic, developmental, and more.
With the help of experts, Junior Ivy League
offers some guidance for parents who suspect
that their child may be in need of services
for special education.
The
good news is that most children can be helped;
the bad is the heartbreak that parents keenly
feel, and that often remediation takes tons
of time, work, and a toll on the family.
Karen
Quinn, author of “The Ivy Chronicles,”
a hysterical, yet charming take on the city’s
private school admissions scene, found her son’s
speech delays at three-and-a-half were the result
of reoccurring ear infections and the subsequent
fluid that built up. He couldn’t hear,
so speech delays naturally ensued. Quinn found
the solution by having tubes inserted into her
son’s ears. But, by that time Sam had
bombed his ERB, and was in need of special ed
services.
Luckily,
Quinn a savvy parent knew to take Sam’s
evaluations to the city, “We received
funding for a SEIT (Special Education Itinerant
Teacher), who followed him around his preschool
several days a week.” She also received
money for speech therapy and occupational therapy.
“Beyond
that,” recalled Quinn. “I worked
with Sam every night for about half an hour…I
made it my business to find out what we could
do together that would help him grow developmentally.”
She
said, “To him, it was playing, but I knew
we were augmenting all the special support he
was already getting through his preschool and
city services.”
A
year later, Sam took the ERB again and scored
the highest in his preschool class. His delays
were gone, even his teachers couldn’t
tell.
But,
results vary. Not every child is as lucky as
Sam.
Some
parents just can’t work with their children,
because either the child is resistant or the
parent isn’t up to the job. Nanci Brody,
a special educator for 18 years and parent of
a son who required additional services. He’s
now a graduating high school senior. Brody spearheads
advocacy groups, like SPIN (Students & Parents
Information Network Support), and the first
Annual Spring Resource Fair. The fair will be
from 3:30 to 7 p.m. at the JCC of Manhattan
(the email is: spinsinfo@aol.com).
There
was no way Brody was going to tackle the task
of working with her son, Matt, so she hired
tutors for reasonable fees to do the job. “When
children are tutored by their parents,”
she said, “it can be an emotionally charged
experience.” Brody points out that too
often children will worry too much about disappointing
mom and dad, and miss out on what’s being
taught.
In
their new book, “A Parent’s Guide
to Special Education in New York City and the
Metropolitan Area,”(Teachers College Press,
June 2006), co-authors, Laurie DuBos and Jana
Fromer offer help to parents, who are often
too overwhelmed by emotion and bureaucracy to
be effective advocates for their children in
need. DuBos is a 30-year veteran in the field
special education and an Assistant Professor
in the Graduate School at The College of New
Rochelle, and co-founder of the Gillen Brewer
School. Fromer is the mother of an 11-year-old
son, currently enrolled at the Mary McDowell
Center for Learning.
Early
signs are often the most telling, “My
first clue was his speech delay and three-and
a half,” recounted Fromer.
“Basically,”
she said, “he appeared to be in his own
world. He was a sunny, little blond bundle of
happiness. But when you looked further, you
expected to hear speech developing and it wasn’t.
He maybe used 100 words.” It took her
a little while before she could figure it all
out. Now when she walks onto a playground. she
can tell who may have issues just by who will
allow their space to be invaded by another child
and who won’t.
Fromer
rolled up her sleeves, spending hours upon hours
of testing —first for speech, then onto
occupational therapy for motor skills, and physical
adaptiveness. Then, filling out form after form,
she talks about her challenges, barely finding
enough time to mention her son’s myriad
of good qualities.
“A
big thing is filling out forms,” Fromer
said. “Your social history and an in-depth
family history, which you realize you’ll
probably be doing for the rest of your life.”
Obviously,
each child is different, but with a yeoman’s
effort, a child with special needs can be mainstreamed
and do exceptionally well, like Sam who is thriving
at his top private school. With other children
there may be less success, but they can still
make it with their self esteem intact with ample
effort and support.
DuBos
offers two scenarios. The best: “The young
child who receives early intervention programs
and services who is able to remain in an inclusive
setting. Or, for the slightly older child who
receives intervention and services as soon as
possible so they can learn to compensate for
learning difficulties and gain self-confidence
in their skills.” And the worst: “No
intervention that often leads to failure in
school, poor self-esteem, dropping out of school
with limited skills for work and life.”
—Victoria
Goldman, VictoriaGoldman.net |
|
Baby
Shall Enroll: Mommy Knows
When
Tracy Geller Doyle gave birth to her son almost
three years ago, she made two phone calls, one
to her temple to ask that her son's name be
put on the nursery school waiting list, and
one to Free to Be Under Three, a language-building
mommy-and-me class on the Upper East Side.
"I
literally called from the hospital bed to put
his name on the wait list," Mrs. Doyle
recalled. "If you want to get into Free
to Be, you have to do it right away."
As
if dressing their babies in $90 designer jeans
and ensconcing them in $700 strollers wasn't
enough, upper-middle-class parents in Manhattan
are now making sure their infants and toddlers
are enrolled in the right play group.
Of
a different breed than classes at the local
Y.M.C.A., these programs can cost upward of
$500 for a series of lessons, say, in music,
swimming or art and are sending parents into
competition mode well before the typical preschool
scramble.
The
increased jockeying for popular programs, some
with monthslong waiting lists, is fueled by
word of mouth, as one mother tells another how
much her son loved learning his ABC's to disco
music. Some classes have acquired the reputation
among parents—exaggerated, it seems—of
being feeder programs to preschools that are
feeder programs to private schools.
Parents
often feel lucky just to get into some of these
playgroups. Earlier this year, Nanne Puritz
Allecia, who lives on the Upper East Side, waited
by the phone to enroll her son in a class for
6-month-olds at Little Maestros, a popular music
program with nine locations around the city.
One of the program's most impressive features
is a live adult band at every class, complete
with five vocalists, a drummer, guitarist, piano
player and sometimes a saxophonist.
Ms.
Allecia called on enrollment day precisely at
8 a.m. and was shocked to learn her son would
be filling one of the last two spots. "This
was sight unseen," she said. "I didn't
know anything about the class, I just knew about
the hype." Enrichment classes have become
more competitive at a time when the number of
young children in the city is increasing. According
to census estimates, the number of children
under 5 in Manhattan rose by more than 25 percent
between 2000 and 2004, after years of decline.
"It's
become a craze in the city to get into a mommy-and-me
class," said Catherine Shepard, the mother
of a 3-year-old and an 11-month-old. Her boys
have taken gym and art classes and have recently
learned about music with stuffed animals at
the Diller-Quaile School of Music on East 95th
Street, where the cost of a yearlong program
ranges from $1,290 to $5,745.
"I've
been to parties or lunches with people while
they're pregnant and they're like, 'Oh my gosh,
I have to sign up for this or that,' "
Mrs. Shepard said. "When I grew up in Manhattan,
you went to the park and on play dates and that
was that."
The
obsession with playgroups is relatively recent,
child experts say.
"Basically,
all of a sudden you can't stay at home with
the baby," said Dr. Michel Cohen, the founder
of TriBeCa Pediatrics. "That's the new
trend." Dr. Cohen, who wrote "The
New Basics: A-Z Baby & Child Care for the
Modern Parent" (HarperCollins, 2004), said
enrichment classes don't necessarily make a
difference to a child's development. "The
child is often oblivious to what's going on,"
he said. The biggest beneficiaries might be
the stay-at-home parents, especially in the
winter, when they can feel most isolated.
Parents
say they like classes because they provide socializing
for both themselves and their youngsters. Some
say they sign up because they want to give their
child every opportunity to flourish, and they
fear that without the classes, their youngster
might be at a disadvantage.
"I
want my child to have any edge another child
has," said Andrew San Marco, whose 3-year-old
daughter takes four classes a week at a cost
of $6,000 a year. He said the Little Maestros
playgroup, has enhanced her vocabulary.
"She's
very well rounded," he said.
He
also said he believed that her classes had helped
her gain admission to the private preschool
on the Upper East Side she now attends. But
Karen Quinn, a former preschool and kindergarten
admissions adviser who wrote the novel "The
Ivy Chronicles," said that although
schools like to see that a child "hasn't
been sitting at home watching 'Barney' all day,"
they don't care whether the child has been enrolled
in a playgroup that has "a degree of cachet"
or a class at a place like Gymboree. Some parents
choose a particular playgroup because they have
their eye on a preschool connected to it. One
woman, who spoke anonymously to avoid offending
anyone at the school, enrolled her child in
a class at a Park Avenue synagogue and said
her child was later accepted into the nursery
school there.
"I
was told by friends that it's the best way to
increase your chances," she said. "But
when you join up they tell you being in this
class is not going to help you get in."
Whatever
the parents' motivation, enrollment in many
playgroups is swelling. Glenn Pepper, who runs
Take Me to the Water, a swim program at 22 private
pools across Manhattan, said he adds staff members
to handle calls on the first day of enrollment
for his $300 spring sessions for babies. "We'll
book about 1,000 spots in the first seven or
eight hours," Mr. Pepper said.
Marni
Konner, who founded Little Maestros four years
ago, said enrollment had grown to 115 classes
of up to 20 children each, from 7 classes of
about 10 children each. Tuition is $360 to $680
a session, depending on length. "We get
about 50 calls each day from people we've never
heard from wanting to put their kids on the
wait list or mailing list," she said. Some
parents, she added, pay for a summer session
even if they don't plan to attend, so they can
retain priority registration in the fall.
Mr.
Pepper said irate parents have threatened to
picket because they didn't get into the class
they wanted. Ms. Konner said she and her staff
members regularly console crying parents and
have been given baskets of gourmet food or luxury
gift certificates by hopeful — or grateful
— families.
Joe
Robertson, who runs the ever-popular Free to
Be Under Three playgroup at All Souls Church
on the Upper East Side (tuition: $425 to $575
for 12 classes ), said he gets gift offers from
parents trying to move children up the waiting
list. "We once had a woman who was sure
we needed a grand piano for our program,"
he said. "I said, 'Well, thank you, but
it's first come first served. Even my godson
had to wait.' "
Sometimes
Mr. Robertson talks mothers out of enrolling
a child at all. "We'll call them with a
spot that's opened up and they can't do it because
every single day they have two or three things.
I tell them, 'I don't think you need another
class.' "
Still,
some parents won't be dissuaded. Mrs. Doyle,
who had her son wait-listed from the maternity
ward, said she had second thoughts about his
being in three classes at just one year old.
But she did it anyway.
"My
husband thought it was way too much, my mother
thought it was way too much," she said.
She now spends $5,000 to $10,000 a year on mommy-and-me
programs for her son, who is now 2½,
she said. "I think it's ridiculous, but
at the same time I'd do anything for my kid."
—Tatiana
Boncompagni, New York Times
5/11/2006 |
|
Tutoring Through The Terrible 2's
TRIBECA-based
tutor Karen Quinn began to suspect that her
job was far too stressful—for her as well
as her clientele—the day that one of her
students blew a crucial admissions interview.
"He pooped his Pampers," she says.
"The parents were beside themselves! They
didn't know what to do. They pretended it was
the little girl standing next to him."
Alas, it didn't work: "These nursery schools
want the kids potty trained, and the child did
not get in," Quinn says. "He blew
it with the poop."
Until
she quit in 2003—after just three years—Quinn
co-owned and operated a private tutoring service
for toddlers whose parents were desperately
angling to get them into one of the city's "Baby
Ivys," those nursery and pre-Ks that are
believed to be pipelines to the best private
schools. (She turned her experiences into a
bestselling book called "The Ivy Chronicles.")
Quinn—who
was formerly a marketer at American Express
(her business partner was an educational social
worker)—saw 20 to 30 kids a year and charged
a $2,500 flat fee. Most of the time, she says,
she was just counseling the parents, since "there's
nothing you can do with 11/2-year-olds, really."
So
Quinn learned how to gingerly handle the most
demanding of parents: "I had one father
who hired an acting coach to work with his child
because he thought he had a 'blah' personality.
He was 4. He wanted the kid to sparkle."
Another 4-year-old faked a heart attack in the
middle of a test: "I think he sucked up
all the stress his parents had over it,"
Quinn says. Still, she maintains that most parents
were "nice, normal people" who just
lost perspective.
Like
one of Quinn's former clients, a native New
Yorker who was shocked by how competitive she
found herself when it came to her only daughter's
preschool education. "What really got me
going—we didn't get into our own temple's
preschool!" she says, still indignant.
"We were friendly with the cantor and the
rabbi, and they ran a very prestigious preschool.
I thought it was a slam-dunk."
Though
her husband "didn't buy into it,"
she took her daughter to Quinn. "We were
working on her math skills, her life skills."
Ultimately, it made no difference: her daughter's
score on the ERB—the test little private-school
aspirants must take—didn't spike.
"These
parents are coming from a good place, the 'nothing-but-the-best-for-my-kids'
place, but it's a cultural sickness," says
the Bridge Coaching Institute's Ellen McGrath.
"It's so destructive. What you're teaching
your kid is that they're not good enough, that
status and power are the most important things.
And you're setting up other people to control
and manipulate them."
Quinn
herself quit after one of her charges threw
an "age-appropriate" temper tantrum.
"She held up her hands and yelled, 'Stop!
Stop! I'm only 4!' And then I thought, 'I don't
think this is what I want to keep doing.' "
—Maureen
Callahan, New York Post
5/9/2006 |
|
Extra
Credit
A
phalanx of baby carriages sporting some
of Manhattan's toniest tots was perambulating
into the Whitney Museum's March 1 member
preview of the first truly superb
Biennial show in decades. The young parents
seemed especially eager to give Junior
a head start on learning how to play well
with others—if not yet on a global
scale, then on the Manhattan benefit society
circuit. "The earlier they get exposed
to this stuff, the better," says
New York celebrity biographer, Mark Bego.
"You've got to get kids into fundraising
before they know how much work it is."
Or
apparently, before they even know how
to talk. At Memorial Sloan-Kettering's
annual Bunny Hop charity event in March,
15-month-old carriage cruiser Dylan Rem
was one of hundreds of pre-school attendees. |
|
The
charity-by-and-for-kids raises about $250,OOO
annually for the Cancer Centers Department of
Pediatrics. Says father Gerard Rem, a real estate
executive: "Families with kids tend to stay
in at night, and charity family events are a good
way to keep us involved [in the charity circuit]."
But
Sloan's family events are not just about getting
parents to pledge. Kids—the older ones,
anyway—also pitch in. This year, Society
Kids Kick In—a new junior-junior
fundraising group ( 8- to 12-year-olds)—raised
$1,359 at the Hop for the hospital's pediatrics
center. Armed with buckets, the children were
set loose at the event to hit up adults for
spare change—and then some—in a
new program called Every Penny Counts.
Truth
be told, kiddie charity benefits are happening
all over the city this season. As any Manhattan
mom knows all too well by now, the baby boomlet—an
eruption of twins and triplets—is inspiring
even charities to get more family-friendly this
year. Another reason for the ubiquity of the
stroller set at charity events this season?
Author Karen Quinn says it's 'new-money guilt.'
"Parents don't want to raise a brat."
Indeed, they want to expose little Johnny to
real-life experiences, such as giving
toys to those children less fortunate, she says.
But the biggest driver of all may be simple
practicality. The rivalry among Manhattan parents
to win a coveted spot for their child in one
of the city's elite private kindergartens is—by
all accounts this season—the most grueling
in recent memory. Not only must parents write
an essay, but they must also endure an admissions
interview. Parents can count on being asked,
" 'What do you do together as a family?'
" says Quinn, author of the 2005 national
best-seller, The Ivy Chronicles, a
humorous, fictionalized account of the most
nerve-wracking proccess in the world. "Sure,
you can talk about how you love to sail together
on your yacht or ski the French Alps. But you
want to balance that message (which says that
you can afford life's luxuries so you can also
afford to make a nice donation to the school)
with talk of how you and your children built
a house in Guatemala last summer for Habitat
for Humanity (which says something very nice
about who you are and the values you want to
impart to your children)."
Of
course, involving the children in charity early
isn't just about keeping up appearances. Harry
Haun, a writer for Playbill, says the first
time Broadway's Actors' Fund held its annual
"Nothing Like a Dame" event—a
performance benefit for actress Phyllis Newman's
Women's Health lnitiative—"the most
memorable sketch involved choreographer-mothers
literally throwing their babies around the stage."
This year, one of those babies, Catherine Hurlin,
now 10, returned to dance-and to fundraise.
Which just goes to show that sometimes, what
goes around comes around.
Charity
truly does begin at home.
—Marcy
MacDonald, Contribute New York
April 2006 |
|
In
Baby Boomlet, Preschool Derby Is the Fiercest
Yet
The
fierce competition for private preschool in
New York City has been propelled to such a frenzy
this year by the increased numbers of children
vying for scarce slots that it could be mistaken
for a kiddie version of "The Apprentice."
Take
the case of the Rabbani twins, who live on the
Upper West Side. Their father, Usman Rabbani,
graduated from Yale 10 years ago, has a master's
degree from Harvard and works for a major drug
company in Manhattan. Despite his accomplishments,
Mr. Rabbani was stumped when he sat down to
compose a short essay a couple of months ago.
His
assignment? To profile his two toddlers. Of
his 18-month-old son Humza he eventually wrote,
"He knows that birds like to sit on rooftops
when they are not on the ground, that cats and
dogs like to be petted, and that the blue racquetballs
in the can belong in the racquetball court upstairs."
About
Humza's twin, Raza, he wrote, "He is happy
to point out all his body parts when asked."
With
those words, Mr. Rabbani conquered parental
writer's block and entered this year's version
of the altered universe of private preschool
admissions. After years of decline, the number
of children under 5 in Manhattan, where the
most competitive programs are located, increased
by 26 percent between 2000 and 2004, according
to census estimates. Yet the number of slots
has not kept apace.
"These
are the kids who are 2, 3, 4, and 5 years old
now, trying to get into preschool and kindergarten,"
said Amanda Uhry, the owner of Manhattan Private
School Advisors, a consulting firm for parents.
"And it's a nightmare."
This
is the moment of maximum anxiety for parents,
many of whom have applied to so-called safety
preschools, just hoping their children will
be accepted somewhere. And the hot pursuit of
slots has continued despite tuition that can
run over $10,000 a year for 3-year-olds. Acceptance
letters were sent out last Wednesday for private
kindergarten programs, to be followed next week
by the telltale thick or thin envelopes from
the preschools.
"We're
feeling it," said Ellen Bell, an admissions
official at the Ethical Culture Fieldston School,
an elite private institution. "It's a real
problem for us to deal with the number of applicants
and deal with them properly the way we want
to, to be fair with every family. These numbers
are just becoming overwhelming."
"I
see a greater angst in the parent, and that
troubles me, and my heart goes out to them,"
she added. "We're sending out more news
that people don't want to get."
Part
of the problem is that the number of twins and
triplets born to women in New York City has
increased, according to city Health Department
statistics.
In
1995, there were 3,707 twin births in all the
boroughs; in 2003, there were 4,153; and in
2004, there were 4,655. Triplet births have
also risen, from 60 in 1995, to 299 in 2004.
Because preschools strive for gender and age
balance in generally small classes — and
also, some parents suspect, as many potential
parental donors as possible — it is harder
to get multiple slots in one class.
"I
tell families that they may increase, hopefully
double or triple, their options, by telling
schools they are willing to separate their children,"
said Emily Glickman, whose firm, Abacus Guide
Educational Consulting, helps parents win admission
to private schools.
"Unfortunately
we are in a very cutthroat climate right now,
where the schools have the power," Ms.
Glickman added.
New
York City has about half the capacity it needs
for its youngest students, public and private,
said Betty Holcomb, the policy director of Child
Care Inc., an agency in Chelsea that provides
referral services for early child care.
"Even
if you're rich, you're not guaranteed a place
in a preschool," Ms. Holcomb said.
So
this year, the application essay, which parents
might once have dashed off in a few sentences,
has become a reason for more hand wringing.
"What
do you say about someone who just popped out?"
Mr. Rabbani asked. "You're just getting
to know them yourself."
In
a sign of how overwrought the process has become,
production is in progress on a pilot for a cable
television reality series, "Manhattan Mom,"
about the daily travails of a New York woman.
A producer said the series would include at
least one episode focusing on the mother's struggles
to get her 5-year-old into a top private kindergarten.
But
none of the 25 or so private schools the producers
called will allow the producers to film any
part of the process.
"They
don't want publicity," said Rachel Tung,
one of the producers.
Few
schools were interested in talking about the
application process to a reporter, either; nearly
a dozen did not return calls for comment. But
many parents poured out their frustration.
The
preschool essays are just part of the problem,
they say. Time-consuming interviews, observed
play sessions, rising tuition costs and application
fees, preferences shown to siblings and families
who have connections to the school, and the
increasing difficulty of gaining admission for
twins and triplets, parents say, are making
the process more stressful for the entire family.
"I
didn't get a real sense of competition like
this until I was doing my college applications,
and even that seemed easier," said Mr.
Rabbani, who went to high school in a small
Canadian town near Buffalo.
Lori
Malloy, who lives on the Upper West Side, watched
friends try to get their children into preschool
last year, and she remembered thinking, "I'm
not going to get stressed out like the rest
of these ladies." But when Ms. Malloy,
a federal prosecutor, applied for her twins,
a boy and a girl, she asked her husband to write
the application essay.
"I
was so nervous," she said, "and I'm
someone who took the LSAT, who's written for
the federal judiciary and in law review."
The family applied to four schools.
"There's
not a week that goes by that I don't regret
that I didn't apply to three or four more,"
Ms. Malloy said.
Consultants
are reaping benefit from the competition. Victoria
Goldman, a consultant and an author of guides
to Manhattan private schools, said, "This
year, I've gotten more calls for nursery school
than kindergarten."
In
writing the essay, parents can turn to the seminars
that focus on "idea starters for application
essays." Some good words to use in describing
your child? Enthusiastic, creative, inquisitive,
sensitive, consultants say.
Ms.
Uhry, the consultant, said it was almost impossible
to overstate the importance of the essay.
"The
first way of separating the wheat from the chaff
is to get rid of those essays in which the parents
couldn't be bothered enough to write a decent
essay or take this whole process seriously,"
she said. "It is your calling card. It
is your entree."
Still,
no one can say for sure how much the essay matters.
Some consultants think it is more important
to have a strong contact or family friend already
in the school of choice.
Mr.
Rabbani's advice? "You have to get creative
in describing your child."
Hence, his son Humza, in his essay, is "a
soft-hearted jock." And Humza's brother
Raza is "a thinker and a mischievous lover."
Perhaps Mr. Rabbani knows what he's talking
about: Humza and Raza got into their parents'
first choice of preschool two weeks ago. They
were notified before most other parents because
they applied through an early decision program.
—Susan
Saulny, New York Times
3/3/2006 |
|
A
Learning Experience
The
anxiety in Manhattan was palpable last week
as parents made last-ditch efforts to get their
children into the city's top private schools
before acceptance letters are sent out in the
next few days: strategizing over recommendations,
pressuring influential friends to put in a good
word, stalking the sidelines as nursery school
directors traded their children's future like
stock on the Nasdaq.
Of
course, it's all worth it in the end, right?
Everyone knows that private schools outperform
public.
Not
so fast. A recent study by the University of
Illinois at Champaign-Urbana has concluded that
when you control for demographic differences,
fourth graders attending public schools do better
in math than those in private school. At eighth
grade, the two groups performed comparably.
For
middle-class parents like myself who struggle
with tuition payments, this is important news.
In 1996, when our daughter was ready for kindergarten,
my husband and I thought we had two choices
— private school or a move to the suburbs.
Based on park-bench talk about public schools
— lead paint, children spilling out of
the classrooms, out-of-control students —
we didn't even consider the possibility.
So,
with "The Manhattan Family Guide to Private
Schools" as our bible, we toured, we applied,
we waited and we were rewarded with acceptance
to a fine independent school for my first child
and later for my second.
Back
then, we had friends who sent their children
to P.S. 6 and P.S. 41, schools that I now know
are excellent. But secretly, I pitied those
children. They weren't getting the low student-teacher
ratio, the amazing facilities and daily doses
of art, music and physical education that my
little darlings enjoyed.
Five
years later, and with some personal experience
under my belt, I became an adviser for parents
seeking places at top schools. When I started
out, I toured almost every school in the city.
To my surprise, I discovered wonderful public
schools. These schools — some of which
required that you live in the zone to attend,
others that your child test, interview or win
a lottery for a place — were run by committed
principals and experienced teachers (who are
paid more than private school teachers, by the
way). The families were involved, and many of
the schools offered unique enrichment programs.
By
the time our children were ready for middle
school, the burden of private school tuition
had hit us hard. We earned too much to qualify
for scholarships and not enough to write checks
for $60,000 a year without taking on a second
mortgage. With my newfound knowledge of public
schools, I moved my daughter to a highly praised
one on the Lower East Side. Although we didn't
live in the neighborhood, my daughter was interviewed
(as were my husband and I), tested and accepted
into the school. The teachers were as committed
as any we had known, calling me at home to discuss
strategies to deal with academic issues when
they arose, working with my daughter after school
when necessary. Because of a learning disability,
we moved her to a private program for high school,
but our experience with public school was stellar.
When
I had my business, clients hesitating between
public and private would ask my opinion. I would
always say if money is no object, choose private
— the facilities are better, the classes
are smaller, more subjects are offered and the
"extras" are unequaled. If money is
an object, go public. If you can't get your
child into Lower Lab, the Anderson Program,
Hunter College Elementary or a gifted and talented
program, then move to a neighborhood with a
highly rated school, like TriBeCa for P.S. 234
or P.S. 89, Greenwich Village for P.S. 41, the
Upper West Side for P.S. 87 or the Upper East
Side for P.S. 6, just to name some of the best.
Take advantage of these great public schools
through fifth grade. You can rethink the decision
for middle and high school, but you'll have
already saved about $180,000 per child.
With
the weight of tuition bearing down on us again,
I wish we had taken advantage of the city's
best public schools in the early years. For
middle-class parents waiting anxiously for this
week's admissions letters, it's something to
think about. Who knows, your publicly educated
child may very well outperform his private-school
counterparts.
—Karen
Quinn, New York Times
2/19/2006 |
|
"Ivy"
Author Dishes Dirt on NYC Swells
Get
over Narnia. Here comes "The Ivy Chronicles."
This
chick-lit book is penned by Denver alum Karen
Quinn. She's the daughter of the late Sonny
Nedler of Sonny's on Fillmore Jewelry in Cherry
Creek. Mom Shari and brother Michael still run
the shop. The book is out in paperback and Karen's
in town riding the wave.
"Ivy"
was a sleeper hit when it hit the shelves a
year ago. It's about a NYC woman running a biz
called Smart Kids that helps get the little
yard monkeys into exclusive kindergartens. Who
would have thought it would strike such a chord?
Well,
Catherine Zeta-Jones, for one, who immediately
bought the rights to play Ivy in a movie, with
Jerry Weintraub set to produce. The book went
on to became a huge bestseller in England and
was picked as a "summer read" for
the "Richard and Judy" show, the UK
version of "Oprah." It started to
sell like a million little Ivies.
Next
up from Quinn, a book titled "Wife
in the Fast Lane." It's another look
at the rich in NYC.
Quinn
is back in Denver for a few days for a series
of talks. She'll be speaking at 6:30 tonight
at a Fashion Group International gathering at
the Denver Press Club. Tix are $30, which includes
hors d'oeuvres. Call 720-922-9715.
—Bill
Husted, Denver Post
2/16/2006 |
|
Basic
Instinct
Don’t
shush that inner voice—it’s trying
to tell you something
Ever
left a boring job with a great benfits
for a stimulating job without, and had
no regrets? Or went ahead and did something
that you knew was right for you, despite
the trepidations of friends and family?
What guided you?
Call
it instinct, intuition or your heart’s
desire. But if you’re like most
women, you usually ignore it and listen
to your head instead. “Women often
think that other people know more, or
know better, so we tend to follow what
others tell us,” says Gail Harris,
author of Your Heart Knows the Answer.
“But if you listen to your heart
instead, you will almost always do what’s
right for you.” These four women
learned this lesson, and you can, too. |
|
From
high-powered to happy
Her
grandmother has her own clothing manufacturing
company in Manhattan and her mom has a Ph.D.
in early childhood education, so it was pretty
much a given that Karen Quinn, 50, of New York
City, would pursue a high-powered career, and
she did. She spent a few years practicing law
and 15 years in corporate marketing. Then, when
she was laid off in 2001, she and a friend used
their entrepreneurial talents to open a school-admissions
consulting firm in Manhattan. But after two
years, Karen had to face the facts: The business
made enough money to supports one person, not
two. Karen bowed out, but knew she couldn’t
be out of work forever.
From
head to heart
“My
husband wanted me to get a job,” Karen
says, “but for the first time in my life,
I wanted to do something I’d thought about
since childhood: I wanted to write a book.”
She had just finished reading The Nanny Diaries
and thought maybe she could write a ficticious
book about a school-admissions consultant in
Manhatttan who loses her job but finds herself.
She asked her husband to give her three months
to draft a novel. Every day she went to her
computer and worked. “I never let doubt
creep in,” she says. “I just believed
I could do it.”
The
Payoff
As
she wrote, Karen told special people in her
life, including her kids’ babysitter,
about her project. The babysitter remembered
that a former client was a literary agent and
volunteered to give her a call. To Karen’s
delight, the agent loved the manuscript and
offered to represent her. The Ivy Chronicles
became a bestseller in 2005, and it’s
now slated to be made into a movie starring
Catherine Zeta-Jones.
Heart
Wisdom
“When
you believe in yourself and let others know,
you will automatically attract people who want
to support you,” says Karen, whose second
book, Wife in the Fast Lane, will be published
in the United Kingdom later this year and in
the U.S. in 2007.
—Sally
Stich, Women’s Day
1/3/2006 |
|
Cracking
the Kindergarten Code
Demystifying
the process of getting your child into a good
school, in eleven easy lessons.
In
the old days, New York City horror stories tended
to involve street crime. Nowadays, many of the
most chilling tales have to do with getting
children into the right kindergarten. “Next
year is going to be even worse,” warns
Amanda Uhry, the president of Manhattan Private
School Advisors, which charges $6,000 to help
families get their kids into desirable private
elementary schools. “It’s the post-9/11
baby boom. So many more kids were born in the
city, and now they’re applying to kindergarten.”
Roxana Reid of Smart City Kids adds, “Several
nursery schools had ten or more children shut
out from getting into school altogether last
year” (and had to, gasp, resort to public
schools). But is it really true that getting
into a good kindergarten in New York City is
as tough as getting into an Ivy League college?
There’s no question that there’s
a crushing demand-and-supply imbalance at the
dozen or so top-tier schools, entrée
to which seemingly assures future success for
junior and unrivaled cachet right now for Mom
and Dad. It’s true enough, too, that at
those schools—Dalton, Collegiate, Trinity,
Spence, Chapin, Brearley, Horace Mann, et al.—your
kid’s application might not even be looked
at, much less seriously considered, if you don’t
submit it within the first few days after the
applications are made available, around Labor
Day. And since 1997, the number of kids taking
the ERB (an aptitude test used by many kindergartens)
to get into kindergarten has grown by almost
40 percent. More families are applying to more
schools now, too—five or six was the typical
number in 2000; now many families apply to nine
or ten.
But
in fact, the panic and excitement over kindergarten
admissions is analogous to, say, half of New
York trying to squeeze into the same hypertrendy
restaurant on a Saturday night. Sure, you want
to go, and you’d love to brag to your
friends about sitting next to Michael Douglas
and Catherine Zeta-Jones—who is, incidentally,
planning to star in a movie about getting into
an exclusive Manhattan kindergarten—but
will you have a bad meal if you don’t?
If you take a deep breath and realize that there
are roughly 70 private schools in New York—and
a growing number of great public schools, too—and
that many of these, far from second choices,
might even provide a better experience, you’ll
discover that you can be much more in control
of the process than you’d believed possible.
Herewith, the strategies and tactics of getting
your child into a Manhattan kindergarten.
1.
Who’s the most important person in the
application process?
The ultimate gatekeeper is . . . your preschool
director. “The schools review everything
with the nursery-school director. ‘Is
the kid really like that?’ and ‘What
about the parents?’ And it’s the
nursery-school director’s job to tell
them,” says Victoria Goldman, author of
The Manhattan Family Guide to Private Schools.
Not
only must directors serve three masters—individual
families, the class as a whole, and the school
itself—but an awful lot can ride on how
well they play the admissions game.
Even
a “Baby Ivy” preschool like the
92nd Street Y sometimes places as few as 15
percent of its little graduates at the elite
elementary and ongoing schools. So at pre-Ks
all over the city, directors are faced with
the task of deciding which deserving children
are a little more deserving than the rest.
The
process is called brokering, which sounds kind
of evil, but in a numbers game, where a pre-K’s
main objective is to avoid a shutout—a
kid getting rejected everywhere—“there’s
not much choice,” said one harried head
of school as she took a break between parent
conferences last week.
Always
remember that your preschool director is not
fully on your side. “Your pre-K director’s
primary loyalty is to getting everyone placed
somewhere, versus getting your kid placed in
your ideal school,” notes Emily Glickman,
an admissions consultant at Abacus. “That
often places parents and directors in an adversarial
position.”
One
father of a boy now in first grade at a good
second-tier school is still bitter when he recalls
telling his son’s nursery-school director
at their first admissions conference that the
family had a very good connection at Dalton.
She pushed them to make Dalton their first choice,
but after they visited, they found that they
much preferred Ethical Culture and even Calhoun
over Dalton. Come January, they sent a first-choice
letter to Ethical. “She didn’t say
so directly, but she was clearly not pleased
we didn’t make Dalton our first choice,”
he says. The result: The boy was admitted to
neither. “I should have kept my mouth
shut until we knew which school we really wanted,”
he says.
No
matter how perfect you think Trinity is for
your child, your nursery-school director won’t
recommend your kid if she has any doubts. Linda
Herman, who runs the Weekday School, acknowledges
as much. “The schools have to trust me.
If I send them a couple of kids who can’t
cut the academics when I said they could, maybe
they won’t listen so hard the next year
when I recommend someone. I have to be honest.”
Well-connected
preschool directors can be dictatorial when
it comes to selecting schools. “Parents
would come to us very upset because their nursery-school
director had such strong opinions on which school
their child should go to,” says Karen
Quinn, a founder of Smart City Kids and the
author of The Ivy Chronicles, a novel based
on her clients’ and her own experiences
of applying to kindergarten. “Christ Church
and the Mandell School are among the five or
six pre-Ks that stand out for their dictatorial
ways,” says a consultant. “But at
least those directors tell you to your face.”
Then
there are nursery-school directors who just
aren’t good at their jobs. One woman whose
son applied last year initially found herself
shut out in February, despite assurances from
her pre-K director that she’d have no
problem getting into at least one of the six
schools she was wait-listed for. The director
also strongly discouraged her from collecting
recommendation letters from connected friends
“because, she said, after the Grubman
thing [an admissions scandal involving telecommunications
consultant Jack Grubman and the 92nd Street
Y], admissions don’t want any of that,”
she says.
The
best way to get your pre-K director in your
corner is to lay the groundwork long before
your applications are due. There’s no
guarantee that your director will advocate for
you over another family when Riverdale’s
admissions director calls and says, “Who
do I take?” But you can avoid the opposite.
Volunteer, give, participate in school social
events, get on a committee, and don’t
make trouble.
2.
Will bribery work?
In a word, no. “Not only will making a
big contribution to the kindergarten of your
dreams not help you get in, it will hurt you,”
warns Uhry. The schools don’t appreciate
being treated like the maître d’
at Per Se.
And
the most selective schools, finding themselves
flush with both healthy endowments and negative
press over preferential treatment for those
who can add extra zeros to donation checks,
have put out the word that money doesn’t
talk like it once did.
Of
course, not all schools are so loftily uninterested
in money. “Look at the schools in the
Bronx,” says one admissions expert. “With
all those acres and buildings, they’re
the size of a small college. For them, a $20
million endowment is nothing, so you better
believe they’re aware of how much you
can give.”
Chapin,
for example, makes no bones about its expectations.
“Annual Giving makes everything at Chapin
possible,” it posts on its Website, listing
the gap between tuition and cost ($6,900 per
student and growing). The schools, however,
can’t come right out and ask what you’ll
give. So consider giving to your nursery school.
Your pre-K director may remember your generosity
at a crucial moment. “That’s definitely
one of the topics of conversation, and it doesn’t
have to be asked explicitly. Your pre-K director
will let the school know,” says one consultant.
3.
Should you despair of sending Junior to an Ivy
if he doesn’t get into a top-tier kindergarten?
Contrary to popular belief, the top-tier
schools are not a go–to–Ivy League–school–of–your–choice
pass. Only a few of them are able to send as
many as a quarter of their graduating seniors
to an Ivy or Ivy Equivalent. Not bad but not
extraordinary, considering the high number of
kids who have an admissions edge at Ivy League
schools by virtue of being legacy kids. If you
go to one of the top few elementary and ongoing
schools, you’re competing against some
very well-connected families.
This
means that “coming from schools like Spence
and Dalton can actually be a disadvantage,”
says Michele Hernandez, a former admissions
official at Dartmouth who runs a college-admissions
consulting service. “The admissions staffs
at the Ivies bend over backwards not to take
kids from those schools,” Hernandez contends.
“Unless your kid is at or near the top
at those schools, your chances of getting in
from the top of a mid-level school are probably
better,” she says.
It’s
important to evaluate what getting your child
into a top-tier school means to you. “There’s
this whole mystique to getting into the ‘right’
kindergarten that goes way beyond putting your
child in a school where she’ll thrive
and be able to get into a good college,”
says Mary Knox, a mother of a second-grader
who chose to send her daughter to public school
for kindergarten and first grade. “My
friends thought I was crazy not to apply to
private schools. It speaks to a basic human
psychology of ‘Do I measure up?,’
which is magnified by ten in New York.”
4.
So what are the alternatives to the top tier?
Many more schools are now worth—relatively
speaking—their $25,000-plus tuitions.
As it’s become harder to get into the
top schools, kids who might have gotten into
a Fieldston in years past are going elsewhere
and lifting the levels of other schools. “There
are so many more schools I’m comfortable
recommending to parents as high-quality and
academically ambitious than just five years
ago,” says Gabriella Rowe, director of
the Mandell School.
So
go ahead and shoot the moon with a Dalton or
Collegiate, but balance that with selections
from the city’s many other high-quality
schools, preferably ones that fit your kid’s—and
your own—style. To find them, look for
schools putting their new money to good use
via new libraries and gyms, lower student-teacher
ratios, and more experienced teachers, often
poached from top-tier programs. Allen-Stevenson,
Birch Wathen Lenox, Browning, Cathedral, Hewitt,
Marymount, St. Hilda’s & St. Hugh’s,
Trevor Day, Poly Prep, and Brooklyn Friends
get nods as schools on their way up, as do hot
schools like Bank Street and Columbia Grammar,
which are receiving as many applicants as the
top tier.
Fieldston
Lower School often gets short shrift because
most parents apply to Ethical Culture instead.
Claremont Prep is only in its first year but
has great facilities, and nursery-school directors
say parents are giving it strong recommendations.
5.
Is public school a viable option?
Of course, no matter how many private-school
obsessives choose not to think so. The answer
to this one largely comes down to three words:
location, location, location. If that sounds
like we’re talking real estate instead
of education, well, we are. Save for the handful
of non-zone schools, such as Midtown West and
NEST, that accept students from the entire district
or in some cases the entire city in a process
much like private school, and the “test-in”
programs, headlined by Hunter College Elementary
and the Anderson School, and including the gifted-and-talented
programs that often determine eligibility according
to scores on the Stanford-Binet IQ test or similar
tests, landing your child in a quality public
elementary school is a real-estate play.
If
you live in the Department of Education’s
District 2, encompassing the Upper East Side
and much of downtown, you’ve got a heckuva
chance to benefit from two decades of a district
administration that brought in and actively
supports terrific principals who’ve hired
gifted teachers from around the country, and
active and wealthy parent organizations. Even
a high-poverty school like P.S. 126 is considered
a model of urban education and attracts middle-class
families from outside its zone.
Until
now, the 239 schools in the city’s gifted-and-talented
programs have been administered according to
a mishmash of different standards—some
using IQ tests, others relying on interviews
or the whim of the principals. Though deficient
in many ways—many accused them of racial
bias—the programs often kept kids in public
school who would have gone the private-school
route. But next year, schools chancellor Joel
Klein is planning to apply uniform standards
for gifted-and-talented students citywide, removing
much of the guesswork—and loopholes—from
the process.
Beyond
these options, public school is a real-estate
play. There are a few other schools in the city
that, to certain families, might even be worth
moving for. Tribeca has three great schools:
P.S. 234, P.S. 89, and P.S. 150. In east midtown,
the Beekman Hill School (P.S. 59) on East 57th
Street rivals P.S. 183 and the schools on the
Upper East Side, and is considerably smaller—always
a virtue. In Park Slope, Brooklyn, the William
Penn School’s (P.S. 321) main fault is
that it’s too popular—and therefore
somewhat overcrowded.
6.
Do private-school connections still count?
One legacy dad at one of the top-tier schools
who’s been a steady contributor to his
alma mater figured on a sure thing when he sent
in his son’s application. “I was
shocked when they told us he was too young”—admissions
jargon for a kid deemed not ready. “Not
ready for what? The rigors of morning meeting
and blocks?” His son was accepted when
he reapplied the following year, “but
you better believe we put a lot of work in the
second time.”
Gabriella
Rowe at the Mandell School sees a seismic shift
in the less-than-meritocratic admissions policies.
“It’s not just talk. Several schools
issued directives to their boards last year
that they wouldn’t accept recommendation
letters from directors,” she notes.
Programs
like Sacred Heart and Friends look askance at
people who trumpet their connections. “The
best way to turn off Barbara Root [admissions
director at Sacred Heart] is to talk about who
you know,” says Smart City Kids’
Quinn.
But
the revolution, however, is far from complete.
Schools like Trinity, Dalton, and Columbia Prep
have well-earned reputations for being places
where not having a strong connection can mean
not getting in.
7.
What are six things you shouldn’t say
to the admissions officer?
“My son has a mild learning problem.”
Though they don’t always like to admit
it, most schools shy away from children who
have issues that might affect their ability
to learn or behave in the classroom. A few years
ago, Riverdale’s then-director of admissions
told an adviser who asked about the school’s
attitude toward kids who might need extra help,
“We’re not set up to deal with kids
like that.”
“Let’s
hang out together.” You may feel like
you’ve established a rapport with the
admissions director. Great, but don’t
spoil it by going too far. One woman ended an
interview feeling so good she hugged the admissions
director. “Sometimes parents end up feeling
so comfortable in their interview, they reveal
problems that could raise flags,” Quinn
says.
Don’t
ask probing, and possibly sensitive, questions.
“The proportion of teachers with advanced
degrees is an indicator of a school’s
commitment to academic excellence,” Rowe
says. “But it’s challenging to ask
about it at the interview.”
Avoid
bragging of any kind, and don’t make any
claims for your child unless you can absolutely,
positively back them up. One Upper East Sider
exaggerated his son’s viola playing, claiming
the boy was a virtuoso on an application essay.
The school asked him to bring it to the interview
to hear his son play. Words like gifted, fantastic,
and terrific can sound great coming from a nursery-school
director, but from a parent they sound like
the crassest hyperbole. If you think your daughter’s
a genius, work it into an anecdote about how
she’s been crazy about math since she
was 2.
Don’t
sound rehearsed. “I get the sense of talking
to more parents who’ve been prepped for
interviews, and it’s a big turnoff for
me,” says Ronnie Jankoff, Allen-Stevenson’s
admissions director. “I want to get to
know the parents, not have people who are coached.”
In other words, “admissions officers have
astute bullshit monitors,” says one pre-K
director.
“And
for God’s sake, don’t mention money,”
advises Uhry.
8.
What’s the best way to talk to an admissions
officer?
Ask questions that relate to what each school
cares about. For example, Friends cares a lot
about creating a community and about community
service. You should refer to that in your conversation.
Bank Street, which has mixed-age classes, is
very concerned that the kindergartners it enrolls
can hold their own with the older first-graders.
Be prepared to tell stories illustrating how
mature little Todd or Sarah is.
And
be genuine. That means not showing up for an
interview at Sacred Heart wearing Chanel and
talking about how important diversity is to
you. If you like going to the ballet more than
working at a soup kitchen, say so, but shape
it positively. Ask questions that relate to
your interests: “Is there a dance group,
because our family really enjoys going to ballets
on weekends.”
9.
Should I prep my kid?
The prevailing wisdom states that not only is
it unhelpful and wrong to try to give your precious
little one a leg up on his classmates, but it’ll
come back to bite you where it hurts. Playgrounds
are rife with stories of 4-year-olds blurting
out, “I’ve done this before,”
at the test. ERB testers, everyone warns, are
trained to spot kids who’ve been prepped,
and admissions directors are on the lookout
for children whose test scores don’t match
up with the teachers’ reports.
But
the fact is, pre-K intelligence tests are notoriously
unreliable measures of intelligence—studies
show that who conducts the test and where it
takes place can alter performance, scores can
swing wildly on retesting, and practicing can
result in significant increases in performance.
What’s more, lots of people prep for the
test. “We interviewed 200 families who
just completed the application process, and
over half reported doing some level of preparation,”
says Quinn.
Child
experts, from psychologists to educators, warn
against outright coaching but say there’s
nothing wrong with helping your daughter work
on the skills she’ll need to use on the
ERBs. “The abilities tested—pattern
recognition, comprehension, vocabulary—are
skills parents should be stimulating in their
children from the time they open their eyes,”
says Dr. Chris Lucas of NYU’s Child Study
Center.
In
other words, there’s prepping, and there’s
Prepping.
The
same logic applies for the school interview.
“Giving your child advance exposure to
the kinds of things he’ll be doing or
asked in the interviews is perfectly fine, as
long as it’s done gently and with your
support and assurance,” Dr. Lucas says.
Though
most schools won’t hold it against you
if you promise your kid an ice cream afterward
for playing nice, they don’t take kindly
to advising your kid not to tell anyone about
it. “That’s a very negative comment
on the parent, and we certainly do take note
of it if we find out,” says one admissions
officer.
A
few preparation options that won’t raise
red flags: For the tests, get professional help
from educational consultants like Sheila Harris,
who suggests games, books, and other materials
parents can use to help their children develop
learning skills, or Roxana Reid, an educational
social worker who runs Smart City Kids, and
who identifies areas in which children can improve
skills that are used in the test and help with
the preparation.
Test
in the spring. “Kids are often more focused
and comfortable in a test setting after nine
months of school than when they’ve been
off playing for three months over the summer,”
notes Reid. New friends, new teachers, and the
fall virus season can all result in lower test
scores. Also, in the spring the field is smaller
and competition lighter because fewer parents
think of doing it six months early.
For
the interview, let your child know what he’ll
be doing. Is it a one-on-one with a teacher,
a playgroup, or a combination? Talk about the
interview in a positive light. And practice:
Arrange show-and-tells with kids he doesn’t
know, and have your child speak to unfamiliar
adults, first with you present, then without
you.
10.
What’s the best way to sway a school?
“We always like to know if a family loves
us,” says Allen-Stevenson’s Ronnie
Jankoff. And nothing says love better than a
first-choice letter, the note most families,
after much hand-wringing over which to choose,
send to the school to which they’d either
most like to gain entry, or think they have
the best chances of doing so—many times
a combination of or compromise between the two.
“Even though many schools don’t
ask for a first-choice letter, it’s a
show of real enthusiasm for and commitment to
a particular school, which makes it easier for
me to pitch a child to that school,” says
Linda Herman, director of the Weekday School.
Why,
you may well ask, if so many schools are deluged
with applications, should an admissions director
care so much whether you tell them that of the
eight, or ten, or fifteen schools you applied
to, hers is the one you’d most like to
send your child to?
The
answer lies in the yield—the percentage
of families who actually accept a school’s
invitation to join their community. It’s
a more important number to the admissions department
than how many applications it receives. “Admissions
directors have to report to boards of directors,
and one of the key figures they’re judged
on is their yield,” says author Victoria
Goldman. In a time when boasting an acceptance
rate lower than an Ivy League college inspires
yawns, a yield nudging 100 percent is a cause
for celebration. “It’s the ultimate
indicator of a school’s appeal and the
admissions director’s skill,” says
Hernandez.
Most
schools in the top tier reap yields in the high
eighties or nineties. Take 10 to 20 percent
for the next rung. “Spence,” says
one admissions expert, “supposedly had
a 100 percent yield last year.”
Game
your choice wisely, because you’ve got
only one in your quiver. Some schools just file
the letters away; others outright don’t
want them. Admissions advisers mentioned Collegiate
and Bank Street among the schools that fit into
those categories. On the flip side, Trinity,
Friends Seminary, and all the girls’ schools
except Brearley are said to value them. Schools
such as Hewitt and Packer, both making strong
efforts to rise into the upper echelons, are
also good candidates.
Finally,
you may have to use your own judgment, based
on the feel you get from touring and interviewing
at the schools you liked the most: Do your child’s
style and academic inclinations match up with
what the school seems to be looking for? And
should you send your first-choice letter to
the school you like most where you also think
you have the best chance of getting into, or
the one you most desire? Which strategy you
choose often comes down to your attitude toward
risk.
11.
What if I get shut out?
It doesn’t happen often, despite what
the gossip on urbanbaby.com’s New York
schools online forum would have you believe,
but it happens: “I always get a bunch
of calls on February 15 from parents who didn’t
get in anywhere,” says Uhry. “It’s
what I like to call the start of the second
season of the admissions process.”
It
may seem like the end of the world, but there
are always options. First, get on the phone
to all the schools you didn’t end up applying
to. “There are always schools that still
have openings,” says Uhry. “It’s
a matter of talking to admissions directors
to see who’s got what.”
Many
pre-Ks take kids for an extra year of nursery
school, especially when their birthdays run
into the second half of the year. Schools like
the vaunted 92nd Street Y and the Weekday School
often have spaces because so many kids leave
for kindergarten at K-8 schools. “Having
that extra year with us to mature and do more
academic work has been very successful with
families that come to us for kindergarten, in
terms of placement at elementary schools,”
says Linda Herman, director of the Weekday School.
“The selective schools like having a child
who’s had that extra year of seasoning,”
she says.
One
downtown mother found that applying after the
kindergarten crush was a much easier process.
“Instead of 500 applicants, we were one
of ten, applying for two spots. It was a much
calmer feel,” she says. Her daughter applied
to four schools and was accepted at two.
And
a mom on the Upper West Side who’s applying
for a second time at Trinity this year says,
“I know the admissions person now. She’s
very sympathetic. I get the feeling she’s
pulling for me, because she knows how much I
want to get in.”
—Andrew
Marks, New York Magazine
11/28/2005 |
|
Author
Terrified by a Crazed Dad
If
anyone tells you it's tough finding a good nursery
school place for tiny tots in this country,
spare a thought for desperate parents in the
States.
Places
are so prized, tens of thousands of dollars
and occasionally an awful lot more—change
hands in a bid to secure a pre-school place
for under-fives.
Bestselling
author Karen Quinn knows the ins and outs of
the business better than most.
She's
written an international blockbuster based on
her experiences running an agency which helps
parents land places in New York's best nurseries.
Now,
Catherine Zeta-Jones has just agreed to star
in a major movie on the book.
But
Karen has told The Weekly News of the
terror she faced when she feared a crazed dad
was going to kill her in her own home.
The
Ivy Chronicles
is Karen's highly-entertaining, fictionalised
account of her real-life experiences. The agencies
are known as "Baby Ivys" because they're
the starting point for an educational path hopefully
leading to a prestigious Ivy League University,
such as Harvard or Yale.
But
parents rejected for highly-rated schools don't
take it well.
"I
had a father at my home who was seeking my help
as his son hadn't got the place he wanted,"
confided Karen during a visit to the UK.
Danger
"The
more he recalled what had happened, the more
incensed and upset he got. Finally, he lost
it completely and went totally mad.
I
honestly felt my life was in danger. I managed
to get into the kitchen and put all the knives
away, as I felt he could kill me.
"The
more he recalled what had happened, the more
incensed and upset he got. Finally, he lost
it completely and went totally mad.
I
honestly felt my life was in danger. I managed
to get into the kitchen and put all the knives
away, as I felt he could kill me.
"I
was thinking that I could die over a school
place!"
New
York has hundreds of parents chasing every vacancy
at the most highly-regarded schools, and Karen's
Smart City Kids agency is one of a number which
offer help.
"We
look to coach parents and children," she
explained.
"The
children are tested before admission, so we
advise them and their parents what to expect,
and we also coach parents on how they should
behave.
"It
can be desperately hard to get in.
"I
once went to a meeting at a school at which
600 parents were trying to land one of just
a handful of places available.
"They're
so desperate, they'll pay fortunes in 'donations'
to secure a place. There was a huge scandal
over a £l-million payment, and I've heard
so
many other tales of tens, and even hundreds
of thousands of dollars, changing hands. "I've
seen businessmen, senior figures who are chief
executives of big corporations, in floods of
tears when their beloved toddler was rejected."
The
Ivy Chronicles has been a huge hit, and
is a Summer Read recommendation of Richard &
Judy's Book Club on Channel 4.
Now, Cathenne Zeta-Jones has bought the rights
and plans to star in the movie.
"Although
the book is fictional, it's based on my experiences,"
adds Karen.
"I'm
very excited at the fact that Catherine will
be filming it, and I'm looking forward to meeting
her."
The
Ivy Chronicles is published by Pocket Books.
price £6.99.
—The
Weekly News, London
7/30/2005 |
|
The
Ivy League
We
love this great new chick-lit book, which will
soon be a film starring Catherine Zeta-Jones
How far would you go to get your child into
a top-notch kindergarten? If you lived in the
New York, the answer could well be: 'I hired
an actor to pretend to be my husband, so we'd
look like a traditional family for the interviews.
Then when our little girl got into the school,
I arranged a fake divorce.'
Welcome
to elite Manhattan schools, where four-year-olds
have CVs, bribes are the norm and thousands
vie for each desk.
It
proves hilarious fodder for the new novel The
Ivy Chronicles (Simon & Schuster, $19.95),
a thinly veiled tell-all from author Karen Quinn's
own life.
Just
like the book's heroine Ivy, Karen was made
redundant and started a business to help locals
win the Holy Grail—a place in a private
nursery school.
'I
once read that if you could make a bad experience
for people into something easier, you could
make money out of it.'
Karen
realised her toughest task was getting her kids
a place in a good school.
'The
children and parents get tested and interviewed
and you even have to get letters of reference,'
Karen reveals.
So
Smart City Kids was born, coaching parents for
interviews and applications.
Many
of the scenarios in the book mirror real life.
Karen actually heard of the woman who hired
the 'fake' husband.
Her
fictional alter ego Ivy hires a 'fake' father
for Winnie Weiner, who has burnt her bridges
at 35 schools. The only catch is the actor dad
is African American.
As
the extract reveals: 'And this little girl is
black?' Archie asked.
'No,
she's white.' Whoa! That gave me an idea. Her
chances would improve if she were a minority
candidate, I mused. We could take her to Golden
Glow and put her in the spray tanning booth.
'On
second thoughts, we may be able to present her
as African American.'
'Oh,
really? How would you do that?'
'Don't
worry Leave it to me.'
'What
happens when she starts going to school? How
long do I play her father?'
'Maybe
you can show up with her alone in the beginning.
Then you can bring your new girlfriend. We'll
ease you out of the picture slowly. How does
that sound?'
And
so the madcap scenario begins, where the little
girl's blonde hair is dyed Clairol Deep Chocolate
#43.
This
novel has just enough romance, adventure and
detail about New York's powerbrokers to be a
real page-turner.
Even
the road to getting published was a typical
New York one, Karen reveals.
'I
told my babysitter about the book and it turned
out that 15 years before she'd looked after
a boy who played with another boy whose mother
was a publisher.'
She
agreed to represent Karen—and manages
her to this day.
'A
few weeks later, my husband and I met the editor
of The Devil Wears Prada. She ended
up making the first bid on the novel. There
was a lot of luck involved in getting this book
published. It was as if the universe conspired
for me for once, instead of against me. My experience
goes to show if you have a dream that seems
absolutely impossible, go for it anyway because
it actually might come true.'
—New
Ideas (Australian magazine)
8/20/2005 |
|
THE
IVY CHRONICLES
Karen Quinn
Pocket Books £6.99, pp436
Ivy
Ames can no longer afford her New York lifestyle.
Personal trainer, nutritionist, doggie daycare,
life-energy coach, analyst, maid, Botox, collagen,
and laser resurfacing etc. Her budget spreadsheet
is in serious need of a facelift when she loses
her corporate job, her cheating husband and
her Park Avenue apartment.
She
relocates to the Lower East Side, withdraws
her two daughters from pri- vate school,rents
a cheap flat and finds a new career helping
the elite get into premier kindergartens.
Thereafter,
the novel is flooded with parents brandishing
egos as big as their bank balances, willing
to cheat, kill, bribe their darlings' entrance
into the best schools.
If
you can stomach the marshmallow prose and caricature
long enough, an entertaining portrait of a stupendously
shallow society emerges. If not, you could hold
out for Katherine Zeta-Jones playing Ivy in
the film adaptation.
—The
Observer, London
7/17/2005 |
|
THE
IVY CHRONICLES
Karen Quinn
This
follows the fortunes of Ivy Ames as she comes
to terms with losing her high-powered job, husband
and plush New York apartment. Ivy is naturally
crushed but pulls herself together and establishes
an agency to help parents get their children
in the city's finest schools. This is when the
author's observational prowness comes in to
its own as she captures this insanely competitive
world with humour, spirit, wisdom and heart.
—Lancashire
Evening Post
7/2/2005 |
|
Summer
Reads
Sales
of the final pick in Richard & Judy's promotion
grow, but at a lesser rate
It
was arguably a misfortune for Karen Quinn's
The Ivy Chronicles (Pocket) to be up
last for discussion in this year's summer read
strand on Channel 4 's "Richard & Judy"
show.
Quinn's
novel, published on 23rd May, the day the show's
selection was made public, had a full run of
sales opportunities across the six-week promotion,
and entered the top 50 straightaway—before
all its rivals. Weekly
sales stayed solidly around the 6,000 mark before
enjoying spikes of 44%,39% and 20% in the past
three weeks.
The
latest jump, following its slot last Wednesday
13th July, was the smallest experienced by any
of the six picks—Anthony Capella's The
Food of Love crime Warner) received the
biggest boost, of nearly 175%, a month ago.
Harry Potter may have been one factor in the
less pronounced impact of the final show, along
with a certain amount of consumer and retail
fatigue. Amazon and Ottakar's both offered The
Ivy Chronicles at £3.99 last week
(see Logobrand's Price Watch below),
but Tesco, for instance, was selling the book
at its full r.r.p.
"Richard
&Judy" stickers and three-for-two promotions
will remain throughout the summer though, and
The Ivy Chronicles will add to its
life sales of 66,549. Of the summer read selections,
only Capella's book and Susan Fletcher's Eve
Green (Harper Perennial), with 68,036 and
69,230 respectively, have sold more copies.
—The
Bookseller
7/22/2005 |
|
Australia's
Sunrise Book Club picks The Ivy
Chronicles as the August 2005 book of the
month:
Welcome
to the Sunrise-New Idea Book Club.
We
have launched the Sunrise-New Idea
Book Club. Each month Kochie, Mel, Simon and
Beretts will read a chosen book and viewers
are encouraged to read along with them.
Do
you have an idea or comment for the Book Club?
Tell
us on the Soapbox.
Current
book: The Ivy Chronicles
The
second book on the Bookclub schedule is The
Ivy Chronicles by Karen Quinn.
Over
the next month, Kochie, Mel, Simon and Beretts
will share their thoughts on the book through
online diaries.
Each
week on Friday the Bookclub team will get together
on the show and discuss the assigned chapters
for the week.
Get
reading and join in the fun of the Sunrise-New
Idea Book Club.
This
month's read
The
Ivy Chronicles - Karen Quinn
Ivy Ames loses her high-powered Wall Street
job, her husband and her Park Avenue apartment
all in one afternoon. Bent but not broken, she
reinvents herself as a private school admissions
adviser, whose well-heeled clients will do literally
anything to get their children into the A-list
schools. This is a raucous tale that will delight
anyone who loved Bridget Jones Diary. The
Ivy Chronicles (ISBN 0743492161) retails
for $19.95 and is available from all good booksellers.
*For
next Friday, your bookclub homework is to read
up to the end of chapter eight.*
Tuesday,
August 23
Mel's
Diary
The
Ivy Chronicles
is a fun easy read, but pretty far fetched.
Part
One is a bit of a wild ride after she loses
her job, husband and apartment. I mean how bad
can one day be?
Her
life is so far removed from any of ours, but
I did laugh at a few realistic moments... the
killing of the school guinea pig, her desperation
for a Radical Reinvention upon finding herself
single, and Faith, the rich best friend who
has it all. Oh and a date with George Clooney.
Despite her life I'm actually starting to feel
sorry for Ivy, and that's keeping me hooked.
Mel
Simon's
Diary
The Ivy Chronicles so far is a very
light and breezy read, that gives you a giggle
and doesn't overly tax you if you're undertaking
a few chapters before lights out at the end
of the day. It's a very New York story... just
fine for me as it's my favourite city in the
world. With an assortment of characters, all
quirky, some loathsome, who either live with,
work with or a friends of, the central and mostly
likeable, Ivy.
I
guess it's a book that women can relate to more
than blokes (my partner Linda read it in 2 days),
but I'm enjoying it. In the city that never
sleeps, high achieving Ivy and her kids have
just had a big upheaval and relatively speaking,
are on the bones of their backsides... but methinks
she has something in store for the people who
helped put her there.
More to follow...
Simon
Mark's
Diary
Wow - what a day for Ivy. Could things get any
worse than losing your job, and finding your
husband with the wife of the guy who got you
sacked? Sounds like she's finding her feet after
some pretty dramatic adjustment. Still shocked
by the Manhattan lifestyle, it's hard to believe
those sort of luxuries exist... daily baths
with rose petals - that must be every girl's
dream. Everyone should have a friend like Faith
- what about that pre-nup.
Really
hooked on this book, despite originally thinking
I'd never be able to get past the first few
pages. Looked like it'd be a soppy, fluffy chick
book, but it's nice, relaxing reading.
Go Ivy.
Mark |
|
The
Ivy Chronicles was selected as a summer read for
England's Richard & Judy Show!
RICHARD
& JUDY'S SUMMER READ!
Welcome
to this year's Summer Read! Distinct from the
Book Club, the Summer Read titles are all perfect
holiday take-aways, lighter books to be enjoyed
on the sun lounger, covering a wide a range
of fiction genres. There's something for everyone,
whatever sex or age. The list aims to support
new talent, so all the novels are by 'breakthrough'
authors, mostly with their first novel.
The
6 books will be reviewed each week starting
on 8th June. Check out more about each book
below, and come back each week for more details
and the views of R&J and our celebrity reviewers...
Book
1: The Death & Life of Charlie St Cloud
(8th June)
Book
2: The Food of Love (15th June)
Book
3: Good News Bad News (22nd June)
Book
4: The Laments (29th June)
Book
5: Eve Green (6th July)
Book
6: The Ivy Chronicles (13th July)
When
she loses her high-powered job, her husband
and her plush Park Avenue apartment in one afternoon,
Ivy Ames emerges broken but unbowed. The newly
single mother-of-two picks herself up, dusts
herself down and reinvents herself as a private
school admissions adviser. But Ivy has no idea
what she's let herself in for. In a parent-eat-parent
world where even four-year-olds have CVs, Ivy
is driven to lengths she'd never dreamed of
to satisfy those well-heeled clients who'll
do literally anything to get their little darlings
into the A-list schools. Fast-paced, feel-good
and very, very funny, this deliciously over-the-top
tale of mid-life reinvention and unexpected
romance will appeal to anyone who has ever lost
all they hold dear and had to start over again.
It will also strike a chord with desperate parents
up and down the country, forced into ever-increasing
lengths to ensure their children are accepted
by the best schools.
Find
out more about the book, the author, and what
our celebrity reviewers thought later...
WHAT
R&J HAVE TO SAY!
Richard
& Judy are both very excited about the Summer
Read... Richard said "We're looking forward
to the Summer Read, and are pleased to have
found six great books for our viewers to enjoy
on their sunloungers wherever they may be!"
Judy added "Once again there is something
for everyone, and we're also hoping to encourage
people to pick up a few books they wouldn't
usually try, but we're sure they'll enjoy"...
So
don't just sit there whether your holiday's
ina garden in Manchester or on a beach in Madeira,
get reading and let us know what you think...!
GET
READING!
Never judge a book by its clubbers
Richard and Judy were derided for attempting
to intellectualise daytime television, but the
success of their Book Club means publishers
are now desperate to be part of their literary
circle. Oliver Bennett reads up on the facts
Published : 28 June 2004
Now,
the Richard & Judy juggernaut is on the
road again. Earlier this month, the show launched
its "Summer Read": six "lighter"
books for holiday reading. "It's a shorter
list," says Madeley, "but we think
that all six novels are quintessentially good
reads. What is really rewarding is to see so
many people who don't normally buy books going
into shops and asking for all six." And
of course, the new list has already turbo-boosted
sales. "Some of the books have seen their
sales rocket by 1,000 per cent," adds Finnigan.
"So yet again, we've nailed the myth that
people who watch daytime TV are by definition
lacking in brain cells."
What
is their magic ingredient? For it would seem
that R&J mobilises the rump of British readers.
Sure, the Booker, Whitbread and Orange awards
shift product, but if a Publishing News survey
is to be believed, an astonishing 1.8 million
people have picked up books as a result of R&J
exposure. "In terms of immediate impact
on sales, nothing tops Richard & Judy,"
says Scott Pack, chief buyer at Waterstone's.
"It's wonderful for the industry,"
adds Joel Rickett of The Bookseller.
The
R&J Book Club is the brainchild of Amanda
Ross of Cactus, Richard and Judy's production
company (dynasty note: Ross co-runs Cactus with
her husband Simon Ross, brother of Jonathan).
And her inspiration came from the UK's 15,000
reading groups, and Oprah Winfrey's Book Club
in the US. "I'd seen the Oprah effect,
and thought it could happen here," says
Ross. "At first, Channel 4 was reticent,
but then I was approached by the British Book
Awards to televise it. I thought, let's link
to book clubs."
For
the purposes of the show, the Book Club starts
with a report from the author whose book is
in discussion, before cutting back to the studio
where two targeted celebrities talk to Richard
and Judy about their impressions of the literature
in question. Bob Geldof spoke about Star of
the Sea, Meera Syal discussed White Mughals,
and Nigella Lawson, naturally, appraised Toast.
The show then invites comments from real-life
book clubs. "A lot of book TV consists
of people talking esoterically in dim studios
late at night. We wanted something different,"
says Ross.
This
approach is informal, inclusive and inestimably
powerful. "Publishers know that nothing
sells a book like 'word of mouth'," says
O'Connor. "The R&J book show seems
more like a televised discussion among mates,
the kind you might have with a colleague over
coffee. It's intelligent, but it doesn't talk
down to people. Its relaxed feel is precisely
the reason it works." Joel Rickett agrees.
"It's not dumbed down, nor a bunch of intellectuals
trying to score points." He has heard a
few "snobby comments here and there",
but they haven't had any negative impact. Instead,
the club helps the public to navigate a path
through the 120,000-odd books published each
year. It may even put to bed the notion that
popularity is somewhat vulgar: "There is
still a certain breed of literary soul who regards
sales of 11 copies as a reliable indicator of
merit," says O'Connor. "My experience
as a reader would tend to tell me the opposite."
Another
factor, adds O'Connor, "is the honesty
of the presenters and guest reviewers. They
won't plug books if they don't like them".
For instance, Monica Ali's book ran into difficulties
on the show. "It was hard to find any celebrities
who were positive about Brick Lane," says
Ross. Richard and Judy found it "turgid".
Funnily enough, the book didn't show an R&J
effect.
For
many, it still involves an imaginative leap
to think of Richard and Judy as literary taste-makers.
Madeley and Finnigan came to the public eye
in 1988 with the ITV show This Morning, and
hosted it for 13 years, with chat, makeovers,
health, cookery and fashion - and books. "The
'R&J effect' started long before the Channel
4 Book Club," says Ross. "For a long
time, Richard and Judy have discussed four or
five books a week. The difference is that now,
they are in the eye of the intelligentsia."
Another
factor of the Richard & Judy effect is that
it brings readers, and returning readers, to
books. "It's fabulous," says Julia
Strong of the National Literacy Campaign. "Television
is a popular medium and using it to promote
reading is important." Ross agrees that
this is part of the show's grass-roots power.
"We know that it gets people reading who
have never read before," she says. "Recently,
we heard from a man of 60 who hadn't read a
book for 40 years, but had enjoyed A Gathering
Light on the Summer Read list, and said, 'Now
I'm going to read loads of books'."
Just
as Delia Smith showed people how to cook, the
R&J show may become an entry point for non-readers.
("If it is, I find that worrying,"
says George Walden. "We've had compulsory
universal education for 100 years, and if we
think that it's good that people read at all,
then God help us.")
Oddly,
over the Pond, Oprah Winfrey's book club has
changed. Jonathan Franzen famously insisted
that his The Corrections be removed from her
literary circle, and she herself has claimed
that it has "become harder to find books
that I feel compelled to share". She now
plugs the classics, and has recently sent Anna
Karenina to the top of the bestseller list.
"The
key difference between Oprah and us is that
she makes money out of it," says Ross.
"Ofcom rules mean that we can't make any
money. So we are more critical, less mass-market.
It can't help but have an influence if you've
going to make money." So far, the R&J
show hasn't had a Franzen moment. "Zo?
Heller was slightly bemused, as she'd been out
of the country and didn't realise that Richard
and Judy had metamorphosed," says Ross.
She does now.
Meanwhile,
the club is smudging the boundaries between
literary and commercial fiction "There
are influential people in the publishing industry
who understand what's happening," says
Ross. "Take Gail Rebuck of Random House,
who has an incredibly wide and varied selection
of authors, from esoteric to 'gold block'. She
told me that R&J had awakened them to the
fact that you can have a massive hit with a
history book."
Ross
is soon to work on the next Book Club list,
and the industry is beating a path to her door
to get their titles included. She is constantly
asked to extend the Club all year round, and
from next January, she is increasing the list
to include 12 books. But she is concerned not
to dilute the effect.
The
net result has not only been good for books
- Richard and Judy's careers have taken a huge
surge in credibility, as has the whole derided
notion of daytime TV. No longer may we write
it off as cheap makeover telly for the welfare-dependent.
Indeed, no longer can television be written
off as a medium that inhibits reading. These
days, it seems the opposite is true.
|
|
Interview
on the Gothamist:
Where
do you live?
I live in Tribeca with my husband, two
kids, and two cats. We’re in an
old IRS office building that’s been
converted into apartments.
Your
novel, The Ivy Chronicles, is
about the cutthroat and, frankly, insane
world of New York City private nursery
school admissions - a world you're intimate
since you were downsized at American Express
and became a private nursery school admissions
consultant. Is this a thinly veiled tell-all?
Totally. |
|
In
the book, parents do outrageous things
to get their children accepted into schools,
like tan their children so they look biracial
(think "Soul Man") and attempt
to buy off admissions staffs. What are
some of the craziest things you've heard
people do to get their kids into school?
There was a woman who hired an actor who
pretended to be her husband through the
parent interviews for her daughter’s
kindergarten application. She thought
the child would have a better chance if
she came from a traditional family. The
kid got into an excellent girl’s
school and then the couple got a fake
divorce the next fall. Then there are
parents in the midst of real divorces,
who can’t stand to be in the room
together, but who pretend to be happily
married because they know schools won’t
take kids whose parents are going to be
too difficult. I once heard about a father
who put on a twenty-slide PowerPoint presentation
pitching the advantages of his family
and child over other applicants during
a parent interview. Early in my practice,
I had a client, a dad, who got so enraged
over the admissions process during a meeting
at my apartment that I actually feared
for my life. I went in the kitchen and
hid the knives. Every incident in the
book, as outrageous as it may seem, is
based on something real that happened
when I was working with families.
What's
more out-of-control then, nursery school
admissions or corporate America?
Corporations will go to any length, legal
or otherwise, in pursuit of profits. Parents
will go to any length, legal or otherwise,
in pursuit of a place at the best nursery
school. So I would have to say that they
are equally dysfunctional in their own
special ways.
The
book's main character, Ivy Ames, the bank
executive-turned-nursery school consultant,
suffers real estate fall from grace, moving
from Park Avenue to the Lower East Side.
Was moving Ivy to Brooklyn or Queens too
dramatic?
In my first draft, I had Ivy move to Harlem,
but since I’d never lived there,
my editor didn’t think I brought
the place to life as well as I could have.
Since I have live downtown and spend a
lot of time on the Lower East Side, I
decided to move Ivy there in the second
draft. That’s when I invented Kratt’s
Knishery and Michael Kratt (one of Ivy’s
love interests) - neither existed in the
first draft of the manuscript. If I knew
Queens or Brooklyn better, I might have
moved her there instead and maybe she
would have fallen for a fireman instead
of a deli man.
The
Ivy Chronicles in development as a Warner
Bros. film, with Catherine Zeta-Jones
attached to play Ivy. Who else do you
hope they cast?
The book has a scene where Ivy goes on
a date with George Clooney that her rich
friend Faith buys her at a fancy private
school auction. I would be tickled pink
if George Clooney agreed to play that
part. In the book I described Philip,
the architect, as looking like a “young
Ashton Kutcher,” so Ashton would
be an interesting choice. But personally,
I’d rather to see John Cusack or
Hugh Grant as Philip. I’d love it
if Michael Douglas would play Michael,
the deli man. I think he’d be great
in that part.
Your
road to getting published was serendipitous:
Your babysitter knew an agent, and even
though the agent wasn't taking new clients,
she loved your book. And then a traveling
companion happened to be the editor of
The Devil Wears Prada - and she loved
the book and wanted to publish it, starting
a bidding war. Clearly, this could only
happen in New York.
You’re right - only in New York.
I used to have a private school admissions
business called Smart City Kids. After
I left it, I had no idea of what to do
next. My husband was desperate for me
to get a real job with a regular paycheck.
But I couldn’t stop thinking about
all the wonderful stories from my time
in the admissions biz, and I had this
insane idea that I should try to write
a novel based on those experiences –
insane because I’d never written
anything before in my life. I told my
husband that I wanted to write this novel.
He asked, “How long will it take?”
I said, “Three months.” Not
that I had any idea how long it would
take to write a novel. So Mark gave me
three months to write the book and then
I had to promise to get a real job. I
worked day and night and actually got
the first draft written in three months.
That
was when my babysitter introduced me to
the agent she knew who ended up representing
me. A few weeks later, Mark and I went
to the World Track and Field Championship
meet in Paris and got to know some other
track fans, one of whom turned out to
be the editor of The Devil Wears Prada
She ended up making the first bid on the
novel. There was a lot of luck involved
in my getting this book published. It
was as if the universe conspired for me
for once, instead of against me. I think
my experience goes to show you that if
you have a dream that seems absolutely
impossible, go for it anyway because it
actually might come true. Mine did and
trust me, I’m not the kind of person
who is used to having her dreams come
true.
Have
you started your next book? Can you tell
us what it's about?
Yes, I have. It’s about two very
high-powered New Yorkers who marry expecting
to have this very jet-set, the world-is-my-playground
life together. But nothing turns out the
way they expect.
What
would you say to downsized New Yorkers?
It’s probably the best thing that
ever happened to you. Now go out there
and follow your heart for once, you risk-averse
corporate drone. I double-dog dare you!
What's
your favorite subway line?
I ride the R and W most often so I’m
partial to that one.
What
are your favorite and least favorite things
about your neighborhood?
I like the liquor store on the corner
of Church and Chambers because guys who
work there always lend me tapes of the
Sopranos. Over the last few days, I’
ve been watching the first season while
drinking my favorite wine, Conundrum.
The only thing I don’t like about
the neighborhood is that there isn’t
a grocery store close by.
Cats
or dogs?
I was a dog person my whole life until
we rescued this cat on 15th Street. She
lived with us until she fell out the window
and died, which was a terrible tragedy.
Now we have two cats - a Russian Blue
and a Birman. I adore them both. They’re
like little lap dogs who like nothing
better than to cuddle up with their humans.
The Russian Blue is a natural hunter but
since there’s nothing alive to hunt
in our apartment, he stalks ballpoint
pens and leaves one in front of my bedroom
door every morning.
And
what's your preferred book store and why?
I’m partial to any store that keeps
my book where customers can see it. Seriously,
when I walk into a bookstore and don’t
see my own book, I get very upset with
the store. But when they stock the book
and display it well, I feel great loyalty
towards the store and I’ll shop
there and buy more books just to give
them support for supporting me. Having
your own book really screws you up as
a bookstore customer. I can no longer
go into a bookstore without looking for
my own novel and if it’s hidden
away somewhere, finding it and moving
it to a prominent place. It’s sort
of sad.
—Jen
Chung
5/20/2005
|
|
|
'Ivy'
grew out of experiences
Author with Denver ties draws on real life for
humorous novel
Author
Karen Quinn admits that she poured much of her
real life onto
the pages of her best-seller, The Ivy Chronicles.
Like
the book's frenzied protagonist Ivy Ames, Quinn
was downsized from
a large corporation and started a business to
help Manhattanites get
their children into exclusive nursery schools.
But
not everything Ames experiences is rooted in
reality.
"I
did not catch my husband with another woman,
but everyone thinks I
did," laments Quinn, whose literary alter
ego found her husband in the
bathtub with a colleague's wife. "I can't
tell you how many friends
have tried to find out if that's true."
Even
her daughter's psychiatrist was convinced Quinn's
marriage was on
the rocks because of the fictional affair. "It
was hysterical. They
both came running out (of the office) to see
if I was getting a
divorce," says Quinn, who's been married
for more than two decades.
The
University of Colorado and University of Denver
graduate returns to
Denver to talk about her book today at a reception
at the Denver
Woman's Press Club.
For
Quinn, straightening out such misperceptions
is a small price to
pay, given the success of her funny, female-friendly
tome. The
first-time author sold the movie rights to the
book to actress
Catherine Zeta-Jones even before it hit shelves.
And sales were brisk
once The Ivy Chronicles was released, landing
the title a spot on The
New York Times best-seller list for a few weeks.
"It
just goes to show you that you never know what's
going to happen,"
says Quinn, who previously hadn't written anything
except holiday
newsletters.
Though
she'd always dreamed of becoming a writer or
an artist, Quinn
followed a more practical career path. She went
to law school,
practiced for a few years and then became a
marketing executive.
She
was on the vice-president track at American
Express until the
company laid her off five years ago. Aimless,
she and a friend started
a firm to guide New York parents through the
difficult admissions
process at the city's elite schools.
Quinn
spent three years helping run Smart City Kids
before realizing
the company wasn't generating enough profit
to support two people. The
stress of working with difficult and often obsessive
parents also was
taking its toll.
"I
would take on these families and it was like
I was going through the
experience myself," explains Quinn. "I
had a hard time not taking it
personally."
The
Ivy Chronicles draws upon Quinn's travails at
Smart City, although
she was careful to disguise certain events and
former clients.
In
one case, Ivy convinces a single mom to hire
an actor to pose as the
father of her daughter to make her application
more attractive to
admissions officers - a situation that was inspired
by a woman who
pulled the same stunt in real life. "She
got into a really good school
and ended up having a pretend divorce,"
says Quinn.
In
another scene, Ivy attempts to cancel an informational
workshop
during a hurricane and is met by an angry mob
who wants the session to
continue, despite the disaster. Quinn says she
and her partner
experienced something similar the day after
the Sept. 11 terrorist
attacks.
"When
we got there every single person showed up,
and when we tried to
cancel they wouldn't let us," she says.
Worse
though, says Quinn, was one father who, on a
visit to her home,
grew so upset about the admissions process that
she feared for her life.
"I
left the room and put my knives away,"
recalls Quinn. "I thought,
'At least I gotta hide the weapons.' "
Not
surprisingly, Quinn doesn't miss Smart City,
which her partner
continues to run. "We're very close friends
and she continues to tell
me stories that boggle my mind."
Quinn,
meanwhile, is busy working on a second novel,
which is set in
the same Upper East Side world as The Ivy Chronicles.
In
many ways, she serves as proof that success
doesn't depend on
attending Ivy League schools. Quinn, whose family
calls Denver home,
got her degree in marketing from CU before getting
her law degree from
DU.
"I
personally feel that if you can go to these
great schools, good, but
you don't have to," Quinn says. "It
does not ensure a happy life."
—Erika
Gonzalez, Rocky Mountain News
5/20/2005 |
|
Headline Awaits Just the Right Sunday/Sundae
Pun
Karen
Quinn and Jill Kargman were already deep in
conversation when I got to Serendipity yesterday
afternoon. Jill had just started talking about
attending the Chanel-themed Costume Institute
gala in her capacity as a Style.com columnist.
Jill actually grew up within blocks of the ice
cream parlor, so she told us about seeing Andy
Warhol in the 'hood when she was younger, then
coming back to Serendipity as an Interview staffer
when they installed an Andy doll as a hanging
decoration.
We
got to talking about their novels, and Karen
explained how she initially wrote The Ivy
Chronicles on a three-month deadline after
she left the private school admissions consultancy
that inspired her novel, and how she's trying
to work out a more comfortable daily schedule
as she finishes her second book. Jill, meanwhile,
continued her successful collaboration with
day school classmate Carrie Karasyov, putting
together the plot of Wolves in Chic Clothing
over the phone (Karasyov's in Santa Monica),
then taking the scenes in alternating stints.
The two of them are currently working on a YA
novel, to be called Bittersweet Sixteen.
(Which she said will be a little bit edgy, but
nowhere near as controversial as Rainbow
Party.)
While
they drank their frozen hot chocolates and I
dug into a hot fudge sundae, Karen offered a
few suggestions on private school applications
for Jill's daughter, while Jill talked about
how Karen's 13-year-old might enjoy boarding
school, based on her own teenage experiences.
Both of them said they love living in and writing
about New York City, and have no plans to either
move or change themes.
—Ron
Hogan, Beatrice.com
5/4/2005 |
|
The
grass isn't always greener for those with
lots of green
Close
your eyes and envision the scene: The hustle
and bustle of a big city, the smell of exhaust
fumes permeating the air. The sound of idling
cars and honking horns competes with the murmur
of thousands of disconnected people talking
on cell phones and typing on their laptops.
High-rise buildings surround you in this concrete
jungle.
And
there you are, in your stretch limousine,
noshing on delectable gourmet goodies while
a nanny-your day-time one-is talking gently
to your children, keeping them well-behaved
and quiet. You are deep in the middle of the
chaos, yet the world that surrounds you is
serene.
To
some this sounds like paradise, and just another
case of the grass is greener on the other
side of the hill. I know I've had fantasies
of having tons of dough and not enough time
to spend it. But after the most recent book
I read, I'm not sure if I'd ever want that
life.
The
book, "The Ivy Chronicles," by Karen
Quinn, portrarys Ivy Ames, a hardball, highfalutin'
corporate executive in New York City who brings
home more than a millsion dollars a year.
But after her world comes toppling down, she
is forced to give up life's luxuries and gind
antoerh job to support her two young daugheters.
Ivy decides to become a private school kindergarten
admissions coach to help the city's most powerful
(read: richest) parents get their Datanic,
umm, uh, I mean, angelic children into urban,
cutthroat private schools.
Don't
get me wrong. The book itself was hilarious.
There are so many times that I laughed out
loud that my husband was starting to look
at me as if I haoiled from Mars. It just made
me see the light, so to speak. It provided
a glimpse into that Prada-toting, Gucci-wearing,
greed-driven society that I don't think I'd
ever want to be associated with. Parents with
too much money and too little time, toting
their children around like they were the latest
accessory, and just something to complement
your for certain event or specific function.
But
that's not what kids are for! They are something
to be loved and nurtured, coddled and cuddled.
Material things should never replace the attention
or love that we as parents are respondible
for. Whya have big bucks just to let someone
else raise your kids? You'd miss out on so
many of life's little joys-from their first
words and their first steps, their first homework
assignments, their first attempts at tying
shoes and oh, so much more. These are things
I'd never give up, no matter how much you
could pay me.
Reading
this book made me happy to be right where
I am-a country girl at heart (OK, for the
most part!), raising my kids with good values
and without an exorbitant speing account.
And as flawed as I may be, I think I'm doing
a pretty decent job at it. You know what they
say-the grass is always greener in the countryside.
—Jessica
Stott, The Citizen Telegram
3/31/2005
|
|
The
£3bn cost of bringing up an Alpha child
A
new report reveals just how much parents spend
on nursery care - and increasingly their cash
is going to hothouses where toddlers learn Latin,
Japanese and yoga. But are they doing the best
by their children - or merely indulging their
own competitive spirit?
Laura
Laurens doesn't get normal junk mail; instead
she wakes up every day to a mini paper mountain
of leaflets offering classes in Japanese, painting
and yoga for her child: a not-yet-talking toddler
who cannot hold a pen or sit still for more
than two minutes, much less wield a paintbrush
or hold a lotus position.
'The
leaflets began arriving before Josh was born,'
said the former antiques dealer, who lives with
her husband, an investment banker, in a neat
townhouse in Kensington, west London. 'I tried
ignoring them, but every child I met seemed
to be attending at least one class every day.
'When
Josh reached seven months, I was suddenly hit
by the fear of God that he would not get into
the hugely over-subscribed nursery school I
had put him down for,' said Laurens. 'I thought
that if I didn't start immediately he would
never catch up. I would have failed him.'
Feeling
that if class war had reached the playpen then
the battle must be waged in a whole-hearted
way, Laurens resolved against half-measures
and booked Josh into baby language classes,
baby yoga, sign language and aerobics. It was,
she remembers, a nightmare. She - and Josh -
lasted a single month.
'I
mean, what was I thinking?' she now asks in
shame and disbelief. 'Josh just wanted to be
a normal baby and there was I, trying to hothouse
him to within an inch of his life, pretending
it was for his own good when in fact I had become
some mad, competitive mother.'
Laurens
is far from alone: a survey this week reveals
that the value of the British nursery industry
has hit a record high, with parents ever more
willing to immerse their pre-school children
in a super-competitive, hyper-stimulating world
of toddler classes to get them into their super-nursery
of choice. Welcome to the world of 'alpha babies'.
Emily
Richardson from Sheffield estimates that she
spent around £2,160 a year for three years
on lessons for her daughter, Elizabeth, to ensure
she got into her private 'super-nursery' last
year - a privilege for which she now spends
£215 a week. 'Part of me knows it's ridiculous,'
she sighs. 'But I don't want to take the chance.
This nursery is wonderful: it teaches Japanese,
Latin and ballet. There is nothing Lizzy can't
do there. How can that not improve her chances
in later life when she has to compete against
others?'
Outwardly, parents of pre-nursery age children
claim they worry that failure to get into the
best nursery will set in motion a domino effect
that will eventually shut their children out
of the best universities.
Inwardly,
however, those working in the field sense the
motivation could be considerably less wholesome:
Kate, for example, has been working for three
years at one of the most upmarket London private
baby daycare centres, but is still shocked by
the competition she sees between parents, often
waged at the cost of their own children.
'You
see babies swaddled in designer gear and mothers
ignoring their toddlers and leaving them to
bump their heads while they discuss whose baby
has started tennis yet and which toddler is
able to paint best,' she said.
The
situation is beginning to resemble Karen Quinn's
book, The Ivy Chronicles, the semi-fictionalised
account published last month relating her experience
as a coach for Manhattan parents desperate to
ensure their children trumped the gruelling
ordeal of exams, interviews and background checks
demanded by the city's exclusive kindergartens.
Now
being made into a film starring Catherine Zeta
Jones, the book laid bare a world where parents
feel unable to hold their heads high if their
toddlers are not able to identify farmyard animals
in a variety of languages while simultaneously
depicting them in a range of artistic mediums,
from fingerpainting to rudimentary computer
graphics.
It
is a world that is becoming eerily familiar
to Kate: 'I know that parents have always been
competitive but there are so many new ways in
which toddlers can be judged as succeeding or
failing, that it seems to have spiralled out
of control,' she said. 'I find it all a bit
terrifying. I feel so sorry for the poor kiddies.'
Mark
Pilbrow, a headhunter in Brook Green, west London,
agrees: 'There is a two-year-old in one of my
children's classes who can do Roman numerals
as well as the normal numbers and is being trained
in Latin and French,' he said. 'She has very
deliberately been hothoused: she was even potty-trained
a year before any of the other children,' he
added. 'The awful thing is that she can't relate
to any of the other children she meets; she
just stands there and howls. It's heartbreaking.'
According
to a new survey, The Children's Nurseries 2005,
by independent healthcare analysts Laing and
Buisson, the UK nursery market is now worth
its weight in gold-plated nappies: generating
an estimated income of more than £3 billion
in 2004.
It
is, says Philip Blackburn, author of the report,
an increase of 20 per cent in the last year
with the strongest growth in the private sector,
which represents 86 per cent of the total UK
nursery places and harvests £2.84 billion
of the £3bn total. 'The children's nursery
market is now more than seven times the size
in value that it was at the end of the Eighties,
while in real terms the market has more than
tripled in size,' Blackburn stated.
The
growth in profits is not down to an increase
in demand, he adds, because the under-five population
has been on a slight downward trend since the
mid-Seventies. Instead, parents seem simply
to be prepared to pay ever-increasing fees to
get their children access to nurseries they
believe will best improve their chances of success
in later life.
'The
UK children's nursery market is funded primarily
by self-paying, private individuals,' said Blackburn,
pointing out that British parents are already
spending almost five per cent more on day care
nursery services than they did last year. 'Last
year, British parents spent around £2.7bn
on children's day care nursery services while
this year, the average full-time fee is £134
per week, and £189 in London, a rise of
4.5 per cent on 2004.'
With
parents eager to fork over enormous sums, nurseries
are now able to play hardball with big business:
there are around 145 major providers of day
care in the UK, with the number of major providers
growing by a third in as many years.
'Acquisition
and merger activity picked up strongly in 2004,
with most of the large nursery groups acquiring
one or two medium-sized businesses at the very
least,' said Blackburn.
Serious
money is involved: the biggest deal to date
took place in May last year when Nord Anglia
bought the Leapfrog Day Nurseries for £60
million.
But as competition increases, so too do waiting
lists for the most admired nurseries. When Caroline,
a city banker, gave birth last year to her first
son, she was so determined to get him into their
local nursery that she called the admissions
office herself the same day.
'I
have no apologies to make,' she says. 'I even
tried registering Bobby at the nursery before
he was born because I knew I was going to have
a Caesarean, I knew what date it was going to
take place and I even knew the sex of the baby
and what his name was going to be.
'The
nursery wouldn't let me do that though, which
I guess I can sort of understand but on the
other hand, if they introduce rules as ridiculous
as having to put your baby on a waiting list
for a nursery, then I'm sure as hell going to
play them to my advantage,' she added. 'I mean,
to my child's advantage.'
But
as the waiting lists for the best nurseries
lengthen, Blackburn's survey found that others
are beginning to suffer: the average vacancy
rate at UK nurseries has risen from 11 per cent
in 2002 to 17 per cent at the start of 2005.
Average occupancy is now 83 per cent, down from
nearly 90 per cent three years ago.
'Competition
within the children's nursery sector is likely
to intensify in the near future, particularly
as the government's public sector programmes
develop,' said Blackburn.
'Growth
has been met to a large extent by increasing
demand from parents for childcare, but there
are clear trends that demand cannot keep up
with the expansion in nursery supply.'
'Most
nurseries across the UK are seeing their occupancy
slide downwards as vacancies build up. Some
regions in the south of England may have reached
near saturation given current economic trends
and childcare preferences,' he said.
Sian,
the manager of a nursery school in Camden which
has seen occupancy tumble in the past three
years, believes that her centre is being made
to suffer because she refuses to introduce the
exhaustive range of baby classes.
'Until
children actually have to go to school, I think
the most important thing you can give them is
space to have a rich fantasy life,' she said.
'I refuse to conform to all this structured
learning stuff for pre-schoolers. They should
be rushing around, immersed in their own little
worlds.
'I'll
admit that my hardline attitude against baby
lessons is losing me customers but that is not
because their children are unhappy here; it's
because their parents are unhappy admitting
to their friends that little Johnny hasn't started
Latin at the age of three.
'It's
a complete fallacy that high-achieving children
are the happy ones,' she added. 'Happy children
are the well-balanced ones, and those are the
ones who have been given the space in their
lives to discover who they are.
'Happy
children are also the ones whose parents have
the time and money to give them a comfortable
time,' she added. 'I consider part of my service
is keeping my prices as low as reasonably possible
but I see parents exchanging this arrangement
for another that will financially squeeze them
until the pips squeak.'
There
is little sign, however, that the sky-high fees
of the more competitive nurseries are going
to the staff delivering their much-vaunted services.
According to Blackburn, the three-quarters of
nursery employees who are qualified in childcare
or education and were paid just £6.61
per hour in January 2005. Unqualified staff
are even worse off with a salaries close to
the new adult minimum wage of £4.85 per
hour.
'I
can't believe the options some of these children
are being given and the money their parents
are prepared to spend on them,' said Evelyn,
a qualified nursery assistant earning just over
£5.50 an hour at a south-west London private
nursery that charges parents more than £180
a week. 'But I can't help feel the children
would prefer more time with their parents.
'If
the parents didn't work so hard, they wouldn't
earn so much but wouldn't have to spend as much
on guilty presents. You hear a lot about downshifting
and quality of life, but you don't see much
evidence of it in this neck of the woods.'
'It
can all get very ruthless'
Mark
Pilbrow from west London is only slightly embarrassed
to admit that guilt is one motivator for sending
his 22-month-old twins, Poppy and James, to
four activities a week, including French, music
and Crechendo babygym sessions (a private gym
designed to 'ensure that children are confident
physically, in preparation for entry into the
right nursery schools').
'Our
poor things watch Babar videos in French but
we wouldn't do it if it wasn't fun for them,'
he said. 'Early on, you are aware that others
are talking about these classes. You start by
thinking it's naff and then become part of the
crowd.
'It's
a bit early but we do it to make up for fact
that they have two working parents,' he said.
'The French classes are a guilt thing in a different
way: we're a bilingual family and should be
bringing them up that way, but we're not because
we don't have the time.'
The
Pilbrows pay £45 a week to send the twins
to their pre-school classes. 'It's true they're
barely talking but the language classes are
brilliant: they get nursery rhymes and songs
sung to them in French, so when they do start
visiting their relatives in France, the sound
of the language won't frighten or shock them.'
The
twins are also taken to their local library
once a week by the nanny. 'The pressure is there
if you are the sort of parent to feel it - it
can get absolutely ruthless - but we won't do
anything that isn't fun.'
—Amelia
Hill, The Observer
4/3/2005 |
|
Sunday
Lunch with ... Karen Quinn
REMEMBER
JACK GRUBMAN?
Once
a high-flying stock analyst for Citigroup, he
fell from grace a couple of years ago when,
among other charges, he was accused of changing
his rating of AT&T stock in an attempt to
get his twins admitted to the 92nd Street Y
preschool. This was the kind of story that,
to normal people, seemed to smack of inconceivable
privilege and insiderdom.
To
New Yorkers, it sounded pretty much like business
as usual.
Karen
Quinn is a New Yorker.A tiny woman with a bright
red jacket and a spiky short haircut, Quinn
walks in to Marshall Field's State Street store
and looks around with satisfaction. She likes
it here, especially when she makes her way up
to the seventh floor's famed Walnut Room and
finds herself quite at home among the lunching
ladies already sipping tea and nibbling salads.
Quinn's
novel, The Ivy Chronicles (Viking, $23.95),
is an only-slightly fictionalized account of
the years she spent as a private school admissions
counselor, specializing in getting kids into
the best, most competitive and most expensive
New York nursery schools. The Jack Grubmans
of the world actually were her business.
They
know who they are
So
the first thing I want to know is how her ex-clients
feel about her book. Because I've guessed --
correctly, as it turns out -- that the single
mother who hires an actor to play her husband
and the father who seems to lose his sanity
when his daughter does badly on an aptitude
test and all the book's other neurotic, super-competitive
parents are based on real people.
"They
know," she says, with a smile and a slight
twang that hints at her San Antonio roots. "It's
not like they don't know. They know how crazy
it is.
"So,
they can laugh at themselves, I ask dubiously.She
shakes her head. The craziest parents don't
seem to recognize themselves in the book's characters,
she says. They recognize only everyone else.In
fact, she tells me, the father who behaved the
most outrageously -- and whose antics are described
in some detail -- called Quinn to find out why
he hadn't been included. "I told him, 'You
were one of my favorite clients,' " she
says, letting a little more of her drawl slip
through.
It's
all sort of funny and wacky -- watch the rich
New Yorkers scramble to outdo one another in
the desperate scramble to obtain something many
people get for free -- until Quinn happens to
mention the time she "had a father in my
apartment, and he got so upset I was actually
in fear for my life. I went into the kitchen
and hid the knives.
"Quinn
is careful to make clear that while she was
in this world, she was never really of it.Having
moved to New York when her husband was transferred
there for his job, she'd never heard of the
elaborate and competitive rituals the city's
rich people have created around getting their
kids into the "right" preschools.
There's the admissions testing and the interview
process and the required recommendations --
the stuff of which the most competitive college
applications are made.
"The
thing that got me into the business was going
through this as a parent," says Quinn,
a mother of two."My daughter was 2, and
I started asking around, and everyone told me
I was very late and probably wouldn't get in
anywhere. . . . People were getting their kids
tutors for the admissions tests. I didn't do
anything, which was a mistake."
Lifestyles
of the rich
Attending
the highly ritualized open houses for Manhattan
preschools, she ran into women whose lifestyles
and spending habits were the stuff of glossy
magazines. Private planes -- generally kept
at New Jersey's Teterboro Airport -- were mentioned
with alarming regularity."I remember thinking
how out of place I was," she says. "Why
would they pick the Quinns when they could have
Mrs. Teterboro?"
Quinn,
who ended up starting her own children in a
Quaker school, resolved to help other parents
get through the preschool admissions process.She
had a vision of working with "regular people,"
she says, contrasting herself to the third-generation
Upper East Side bluebloods who seemed to be
born with the intuitive knack -- and very flexible
budget -- required for getting their kids set
up for an Ivy League life.But even regular people,
she says, taking a bite of her chicken pot pie,
could lose sight of their priorities.
"Not
even 9/11 set them straight"
On
Sept. 11, my phone rang off the hook,"
she says in disbelief. "People had the
rest of the day off from work, and they figured
it was a good time to get a head start on their
school applications.
"Did
these parents honestly believe that their kids'
lives would be ruined if they didn't get into
the right preschool?Apparently, yes."People
would call in the middle of the night when they
were having anxiety attacks," she recalls.
"By the end, I was glad to get out of it."
Quinn
left the admissions counseling business for
a variety of reasons, she says, and the idea
of writing a book about her experiences was
something of a lark."The only thing I'd
written before was a holiday letter," she
says. "And, basically, I thought if I could
write a holiday letter, I could write a novel."
The
novel, with a wry, comic voice and a chick-lit
style cover -- lots of pink -- is selling well.
And it's been optioned by Catherine Zeta-Jones,
who is said to want to play its title character,
the punningly named admissions counselor Ivy
Ames.So I ask Quinn if she's considered the
possibility of one day being "Mrs. Teterboro"
rich.
No,
no, she demurs. Because she is really just a
regular person. Really.
—Debra
Pickett, Sun-Times
3/13/2005 |
|
|
The
author of "The Ivy Chronicles,"
Karen Quinn, grew up in Denver as
the daughter of jewelers Shari and
the late Sonny Nedler. |
|
Deanie
Underwood, left, and Kathleen Stowers,
one of the reception hosts. |
|
The
author's mom, Shari Nedler, left,
with Angelo and Margaret Barr. |
|
Karen
Quinn, right, in a light moment
with co-host and friend Danna Wiepking.
|
Photos
by
David Zalubowski |
|
"Ivy"
author's homecoming draws crowd
AUTHOR
KAREN QUINN, THE DAUGHTER OF DENVER JEWELERS
Shari and the late Sonny Nedler, knows
she's one of the lucky ones.
"This
has been so exciting," said the author
of "The Ivy Chronicles" last
week at a cocktail reception hosted by
her Denver friends Kathleen Stowers, Holly
Kylberg, Matt Autterson and Danna Wiepking.
"I'm in as much awe of what has happened
as anyone else here."
"It
is unbelievable," concurred her mom.
Michael
Nedler, Quinn's brother, is understandably
proud of his sister's success and said
he'll be happy "just to ride on her
coattails for the next couple of years."
"The
Ivy Chronicles" is Quinn's debut
novel. The book was published by a quality
house (Viking), movie rights were sold
to Catherine Zeta-Jones and Warner Bros.,
and reviews have been glowing. Simon and
Schuster will publish it in England in
June, and serial rights have been sold
to the Daily Telegraph.
The novel is the fictional tale of a woman,
much like Quinn, who after losing a lucrative
gig in New York due to corporate downsizing
started her own business of helping parents
place their children in the city's "best"
schools.
Family,
friends and business associates turned
out en masse for the reception at the
Fourth Story restaurant and included Charles
Jordy, who has been friends with Quinn's
husband, Mark, since fourth grade. "They
met at DU Law School," Jordy recalled,
"and then went off to New York to
start their high-powered careers."
Others
stopping by to congratulate Karen on her
good fortune were Kathi Brock; Laren and
Marc Naiman; Teresa Immel; Sandy Kay;
Diane Huttner with friends Jane Breault
and Myra Rieger; Carol Roddy; Julie Kucera;
Scottie and Kevin Iverson; Marjorie and
Bob Mock; Rich Kylberg; and Monica Nedler.
The
18th Business in the Arts Luncheon, hosted
by Colorado Business Committee for the
Arts and Ernst & Young, begins at
11:30 a.m. March 10 in the Donald R. Seawell
Grand Ballroom. ... That evening, Denver
Nuggets GM Kiki Vandeweghe and his wife,
Peggy, open their home for the first installment
of Everywhere Under the Sun, a series
of unique-location get-togethers benefiting
Young Audiences. The party's theme, appropriately,
is March Madness and guests will encouraged
to speculate on those all-important NCAA
brackets with an expert. There'll also
be food from Epicurean Catering and music
by the Augustana Winds Quintet. Tickets
are $100; call 720-904-8890 by Monday.
—Joanne
Davidson, Denver Post
3/3/2005 |
|
|
The
Little Ivy League
A
NEW YORK WORK OF FICTION, 'The Ivy Chronicles',
traces the lengths that many Manhattan mothers
will go to get their child into the right kindergarten.
But, as Michael Shelden discovers, the reality
is even more scary. For New York's elite, it's
never too early for their children to start
networking
"While
Veronica takes many different classes, from
language to music to public speaking, her favourite
activity is dancing. Recently, a renowned talent
scout tried to sign her, but we felt she was
too young for Broadway. She loves choreographing
her own shows and helping her seamstress sew
sparkly costumes for all her performances. In
short, Veronica has accomplished more in her
four-and-a-half years on earth than many adults
achieve in a lifetime."
For
the children of New York's wealthiest families,
the class war begins at the tender age of four.
That's when the little darlings must prove themselves
worthy of acceptance at one of the city's private
kindergartens, where thousands compete for a
relatively small number of openings at a dozen
or so exclusive schools. The admissions process
is so intense that many of the rejected families
are devastated and slink away to the suburbs,
convinced their child's future is blighted.
Enter
Karen Quinn, who started a company to coach
parents and children through the gruelling ordeal
of exams, interviews and background checks,
and who has now written a fictional account
of her work among Manhattan's angst-ridden elite.
Her tale is both harrowing and hilarious.
"One
mother who came to me was in tears, absolutely
distraught," she tells me in a tone that
sounds like a kindly doctor recalling the case
of a dying patient.
"One
of the schools had given her some negative feedback
about her daughter. They hadn't even said no
yet, but just the possibility of being rejected
was enough to make this woman ask me: 'How have
I failed my child? Where did I go wrong?'"
Although
the mother in question was a powerful businesswoman
who earned half a million pounds a year - and
could easily afford the annual fees of £20,000
- she couldn't figure out how to rescue her
daughter before it was too late. Savvy Karen
Quinn immediately understood the right solution,
advising the woman to spend more money, albeit
discreetly.
"The
school wasn't aware of how much she was worth,"
says Quinn. "All she needed to do was hint
to the right people that she was 'generous',
which is a polite way of saying she could be
a big donor to the endowment."
How
big?
"A
million dollars will usually do it. But some
people give a lot less or a lot more. I know
one man who built an entire gymnasium for his
daughter's school and it was already finished
when she began kindergarten. The school even
named it after her, which made it awkward. Imagine
how embarrassed she would have been around the
other children."
Why
so much fuss over four- and five-year-olds?
Supposedly, the parents worry that their children's
failure to get into the best kindergarten creates
a domino effect that will eventually shut them
out from the best universities. But the real
reason seems to be mum and dad's own vanity.
They can't hold their heads high in society
if little Muffie or young master Shane aren't
classmates of the other children of New York's
rich and mighty.
"The
whole thing is about making contacts that will
last a lifetime," says Quinn. "You
become part of a vast network that offers a
lot of rewards. So the schools are picky and
they judge the parents as well as the child.
I've had mothers tell me that their child `interviewed
well' and had high test scores, but that the
school found the family less than impressive
and rejected them."
Such
brazen displays of snobbery are rare elsewhere
in America, but it's a tight market where private
education is concerned in New York and the best
schools call the shots. The state schools are
so appallingly bad that everyone avoids them
if they can afford to.
"The
situation is so difficult that it often drives
very strong and accomplished people to break
down and cry or rant," says Quinn. "Women
tend to handle it better than men. The men can't
understand why they have to win the approval
of school officials who make far less money
than they do. I once had a father visit me and
he became so angry that I feared for my life.
I went to the kitchen and hid my knives."
The
overwrought four-year-olds don't fare much better.
Their parents and tutors and therapists drill
them night and day, making sure they don't let
the family down by failing to subtract the right
number of objects in a game or not answering
some vaguely philosophical question ("Why
do we have windows?"), or simply by picking
their noses at the wrong moment, as four-year-olds
will do.
In
the middle of tutoring a girl for the dreaded
Kindergarten Admissions Test, Quinn became carried
away and was firing questions one right after
the other until the exhausted child flung up
her hands and said stop. "I'm only four,"
protested the girl.
"I
knew that it was time to get out of the business,"
says Quinn. "That sent me over the edge."
She
never meant to make a career of it. Originally
a lawyer in Denver, she came to New York in
the mid-1980s and worked at American Express
for 15 years. When she was suddenly made redundant,
she looked round for a business to start and
seized on the unusual idea of advising parents
of prospective kindergartners.
"I
told myself to think of something people hate
doing for themselves, but that I could do for
them," she says.
Married
to a fellow lawyer, she is the mother of a young
son and daughter and knows from her own experience
the terrors that await novice parents seeking
a good school for their children. But she was
never wealthy enough to compete against the
Manhattan super-rich and had only a vague idea
of how they dominated the kindergarten competition.
Her new business opened her eyes.
She
found herself in a world of private jets and
private islands and stretch limos. People were
willing to pay her thousands of dollars to give
their four-year-olds an advantage against other
children applying to the same small group of
schools.
Modest
and unaffected, she lives in a fashionable,
but not luxurious section of Lower Manhattan
and - at 50 - resembles not at all the woman
who has signed to play her in the film version
of her story - Catherine Zeta-Jones. There was
nothing very glamorous about her work.
On
the contrary, she now seems to feel a little
guilty about encouraging so many children to
take life too seriously too soon.
"Most
children at that age aren't interested in doing
the kinds of things demanded of them on the
tests," says Quinn. "They don't want
to identify various shapes and compare them,
much less add or subtract.
"I
know of one wealthy mother who boasted that
she had spent a solid month training her daughter
to draw shapes -even stars. She was worried
about it because the nursery school had warned
her that her daughter needed the extra work
or wouldn't pass the tests."
On
one occasion, a zealous mother watched as Quinn
instructed the woman's son on the best method
of recognising colours. In the middle of the
lesson, the boy put his head down and fell asleep.
"I
wanted to get up and go home," she says.
But his mother said no, keep talking to him.
When I pointed out that he was sleeping soundly,
she says: `He will pick it up subliminally.'
So I sat there lecturing him and all for nothing."
It
was one of her low moments, but there were others
she is proud of. She helped many parents of
ordinary means to navigate the rough waters
of the kindergarten system, which serves as
a kind of doorway in American education to the
more challenging levels available to older pupils.
"Unless
they make a great deal of money, it's very hard
for families to afford private schools,"
says Quinn. "But people want what they
think is best for their children and will do
whatever is necessary to get it. So I would
help them by advising the mother to do volunteer
work for the school or to use the family's contacts
to seek out the best deals.
"Of
course, at least a few places at each school
are reserved for diversity. The normal rules
don't apply in those cases. To avoid having
schools made up mostly of whites, they sprinkle
them with some colour."
It
is an odd fact that the private schools of Manhattan
devote so much energy to keeping out people
and then - perhaps out of guilt - throw open
the doors at the last moment to allow a few
"disadvantaged" children in. They
claim to be doing all the children a favour
by this action, but Quinn isn't so sure.
"My
partner in the business is black and her son
found a place at one of the better schools,"
she says. "But it's not easy for these
children to rub shoulders with those who live
in big houses when they live in subsidised public
housing. They can't help feeling different and
will hesitate to ask other children home after
school."
Quinn
notes the irony that the most selective private
school in New York is named after Horace Mann,
who was America's first great pioneer of state-sponsored
education. If any children from the general
public get into the Horace Mann School today,
it is usually because they are enlisted as recruits
in the "diversity" campaign.
The
more you talk to Karen Quinn, the more you realise
that her book has a very serious side to balance
its host of comic adventures featuring the pampered
rich behaving badly. She cares about education
and sees it being served so poorly by a system
that is riddled with snobbery and cronyism on
the private side and poverty and mismanagement
on the public side.
"It
doesn't have to be this way, but the system
is now being squeezed so hard that the competition
in the private field has shifted to the nursery
schools," she says.
"It
used to be that everyone waited until the kindergarten
year to push their children forward. Now, they
fight over getting their two-year-old into the
best nursery school."
No
wonder Quinn left her business to her partner
and got out in 2003 and has never looked back,
except to chronicle her experiences in her new
novel.
"Writing
the novel was cathartic," she says. "I
had a lot to get out of my system."
Indeed,
she wrote at white-hot speed, finishing her
first draft in only three months. All the frustration
of the previous three years came pouring out
as she described the obsessive parents who are
willing to do almost anything for a place at
school for a child of four or five.
The
writing itself was so enjoyable that she can't
wait to produce another book. "After all
these years, I've finally found something I
really enjoy doing. That's a great relief."
—The
Sunday Telegraph
2/25/2005 |
|
Vicarious
Living:
Power of Snob Appeal
IN
JULIAN FELLOWES'S URBANELY FUNNY NOVEL
"SNOBS," an accountant's
daughter named Edith buys a ticket to
visit the ancestral home of Charles, the
Earl Broughton. This is an inauspicious
way for them to meet, but Charles winds
up proposing marriage. |
|
"Flower
shows all summer, freezing pipes all winter"
says Charles's sister, describing what
Edith's new life will be like. "Does
she hunt?" No, she doesn't yet -
not unless Charles counts as prey.
Edith's
parents chose her name "for the fragrant
overtones of a slower, better England
and perhaps, half-consciously, to suggest
that it was a family name handed down
from some Edwardian beauty. It was not."
But Edith fulfills those ambitions on
the morning after the wedding, when a
hotel waiter calls her "my lady"
while delivering breakfast in bed.
"Oh
well," Edith thinks.
No
one ever went broke overestimating snob
appeal. It's one of the most marketable
vicarious pleasures. And it colors writing
well beyond Cinderella fiction. Biographers
are often drawn to elite subjects. Chick-lit
heroines are perennially obsessed with
status. The coming-of-age memoir gets
more attention if its narrator learned
about life at a socially prestigious school.
And a diet book has more cachet if it
cautions against too many tartes aux pommes
rather than too many Twinkies.
"Toto,
I don't think we're in Hershey, Pennsylvania
anymore," Mireille Giuliano writes
in "French Women Don't Get Fat,"
using the superiority of French chocolate
to weave a trans-Atlantic snob factor
into weight-loss guidelines. Ms. Giuliano
also notes that corn on the cob, while
an American favorite, "is usually
reserved for livestock" in France.
She recommends Champagne as the just-right
complement to pizza. She also works as
a director of Champagne Veuve Clicquot.
Never
mind the implicitly snobbish corollary
to her book's title. (If French women
don't get fat, who does?) Ms. Giuliano
turns out to be eminently level headed.
She combines reasonable thoughts about
nutrition with a general endorsement of
joie de vivre, and her tone is girl friendly
enough to account for the book's runaway
popularity.
Ross
Gregory Douthat's memoir "Privilege:
Harvard and the Education of the Ruling
Class" isn't as lofty as it sounds,
either - even if the author fails to win
membership in Harvard's most rarefied
club and pretends he isn't disappointed.
The closest Mr. Douthat comes to social
demarcation is in the realm of politics.
He claims to have heard "You're not
a bad guy for a Republican" at Harvard
on a regular basis.
Curtis
Sittenfeld's "Prep" presents
another occasion for campus condescension,
since it unfolds at a top-tier boarding
school near Boston. There are rich students,
like the C.E.O.'s daughter who winds up
with a very large dorm room. There are
also students like the book's heroine,
Lee, who doesn't understand why that room
is so big. "Come on," one classmate
explains.
"Prep"
is less satirical about campus snobbery
than the jauntier "I Am Charlotte
Simmons" - in which Tom Wolfe, having
devoted his entire career to sniffing
out signs of privilege, rises to such
tasks as cataloging what a spoiled rich
girl and a noble poor one would respectively
bring to their shared dorm room. And "Prep"
is serious enough to have spawned its
own upper-crust souvenir: versions of
the pink-and-green ribbon belt on the
book's cover are turning up at Ms. Sittenfeld's
readings. But little of this book's appeal
lies in the type of familiar snob dynamics
that make Lee ashamed of her parents'
Datsun. What makes "Prep" work
is the solidly adult, myopia-free voice
behind its high-school status games.
School
days can forge a lifetime's worth of class
distinctions. Consider the evidence in
"The Perfect Hour," James L.
W. West III's recapitulation of F. Scott
Fitzgerald's first love affair. This haunting
book captures the voice of wealthy, beautiful
Ginevra King, who was 16 when Fitzgerald,
two years older, swooned over her. Yes,
it was romantic - but monogrammed place
cards and society-page clippings were
among his souvenirs of Ginevra's world.
Its
echoes would last a lifetime and appear
repeatedly in his fiction (most seductively
in "The Great Gatsby"). And
thanks to the entree that Ginevra provided,
Fitzgerald would become the patron saint
of status-conscious American fiction as
he went on to immortalize "the youth
and mystery that wealth imprisons and
preserves, the freshness of many clothes,
of cool rooms and gleaming things, safe
and proud above the hot struggles of the
poor."
Snobbery
comes in many forms; it need not revolve
solely around obvious forms of privilege.
So Koren Zailckas, in "Smashed,"
her memoir of boozy college years, shows
how status can be linked to the ability
to out-drink everyone else in one's sorority.
And in Jennifer Haigh's novel "Baker
Towers," the story's loving but impoverished
coal miner's family (replete with details
like tin foil on the antenna of the old
television set) is far superior to one
son's new bride, a department store heiress
from Philadelphia's Main Line. It is noted
that her sole culinary skill involves
opening wine bottles, and she can't even
cook an egg.
But
in its purest current form, snobbery revolves
around two things: schadenfreude and cold
cash. So there are books that virtually
attach price tags to their characters'
perks and possessions. Karen Quinn's "The
Ivy Chronicles" manages to fuse two
snob-related genres - I-got-fired and
Upper-East-Side-rat-race - with a woman
named Ivy who loses her high-powered job.
First she is reduced to riding in a bad-smelling
Lincoln Town Car redolent of middle management.
Soon she has no driver at all. Ivy must
give up her life-energy coach ($18,000),
analyst ($24,000), nannies and maid ($74,000)
"and a slew of other expenses like
food, insurance, electricity, telephone,
cable, doctor bills" and turn a $399
outlay into $9.99 by coloring her own
hair. Ivy gets even by starting a service
that helps parents worm their children's
way into prestigious kindergarten classes.
And Ms. Quinn's sendup is amusing, except
for those times when she tries to summon
a voice of hauteur. "How are you,
Ivy?" asks one awkwardly caricatured
blueblood. "You look raaather well
and blond hair becomes you, doesn't it?"
Clearly anyone hoping to convey true snob
appeal had better learn how to talk the
talk.
James
Patterson doesn't need accents; he has
brand names instead. In his latest novel
(and one of his friskiest), "Honeymoon,"
a gold-digger named Nora becomes engaged
to wealthy men and then kills them, for
no better reason than that Mr. Patterson
plans to publish at least four books this
year. One victim has given Nora a diamond
whose carats (four) and color ("at
least D or E") become part of the
story. And when she kills him, she leaves
him "lying on the floor of one of
the bathrooms in his 11,000-square-foot
Colonial."
Mr.
Patterson drops the names of a favorite
ice cream, various hotels ("They
had stayed at the Biltmore, one of her
favorites, but only if they put you in
the main building") and various haunts
around Westchester. And he notes the "regal
burl walnut casket" in which one
rich victim is buried, while also noticing
the "slackers and moochers"
loafing around Starbucks. But the brand
name of most interest here is that of
Howard Roughan, the book's other author.
He appears to be one of Mr. Patterson's
better collaborators.
At
least the big-ticket elements of "Honeymoon"
spring from the writers' imagination.
They haven't cashed in on anybody else's
pretensions in the way celebrity biographers
do. But "Front Row," Jerry Oppenheimer's
tell-not-much about Vogue's top editor,
Anna Wintour, seeks out the snobbery to
be found Ms. Wintour's past. "She
was patrician," says one "friend"
(the kind who would talk to Mr. Oppenheimer).
"She was not a playful child."
And: "Anna hated badly dressed people."
In
some ways Mr. Oppenheimer's efforts are
exemplary. Aspiring mudslingers can marvel
at the sheer creativity of the following
sentence: "Anna didn't do drugs,
even though marijuana, cocaine, LSD, and
everything else one could snort, inhale,
or shoot to get recreationally high was
all around her, everywhere she went."
Also impressive is his ability to string
out the obvious, since this book's focal
point is snobbishly self-evident from
the start. "A mixture of fashion,
wealth and elitism" is both Ms. Wintour's
hallmark and Mr. Oppenheimer's main selling
asset.
As
"Front Row" does its best to
out-snoot its subject, someone remembers
Ms. Wintour visiting an estate, complete
with chauffeurs, butlers, helium balloons
and breakfast on silver trays. "It
sounds all very 'Gosford Park,' "
the speaker sniffs, "but 'Gosford
Park' was about an industrialist, and
Patrick was an aristocrat. It's very different."
That
should give Mr. Fellowes - who wrote "Gosford
Park" as well as "Snobs"-every
reason to turn up his own nose. It violates
"that most tedious of all English
aristocratic affectations," as "Snobs"
describes it: "the need to create
the illusion that you are completely unaware
of your privileges."
—Janet
Maslin, The New York Times
2/21/2005 |
|
|
Educating
Baby Ivy, the Yale kids who start young
THE
SECRETS OF THE PROFESSIONAL “FIXERS”
WHO HELP WEALTHY PARENTS get their
children into America’s most exclusive
kindergartens are to be revealed in a new book.
The
Ivy Chronicles, a lightly fictionalised account
of the career of Karen Quinn, a former American
Express executive turned kindergarten “facilitator”,
will be published in Britain in March, to be
followed by a Hollywood film starring Catherine
Zeta-Jones.
Quinn,
42, helped start Smart City Kids, one of several
agencies in Los Angeles, New York and Atlanta
training families to secure places in pre-schools
that turn away up to 500 children for every
one they accept.
These
establishments, known as “Baby Ivys”
because they are thought to boost children’s
chances of entering Ivy League universities
such as Harvard and Yale, are split into three
divisions: toddler, nursery and kindergarten.
Zeta-Jones
is familiar with the system: her 20-month-old
daughter, Carys, already attends an exclusive
institution in New York, where she and her husband,
Michael Douglas, live for part of the year.
The child is expected to graduate to a nearby
nursery where the comedian Jerry Seinfeld sends
his daughter Sascha.
The
race from toddler group to nursery and on to
one of the top 20 kindergartens is not for the
slow or poor. Advisers charge £3,000 to
train parents and children for admission tests
and fees are up to £15,000 a year, the
same as Yale.
Some
Baby Ivy secrets leaked out two years ago when
a Manhattan banker, Jack Grubman, tried to get
his twin three-year-old daughters into the 92nd
Street Y nursery.
According
to court papers, Grubman boosted the price of
a telephone company’s shares in return
for a $1m donation to the school. The scheme
backfired and Grubman eventually sent his children
to a public pre-school like those attended by
4m other young Americans.
Nina
Bauer, a facilitator at the Ivywise Kids agency,
managed to get her daughter Eliza into the 92nd
Street Y this year. “It was stressful,
but it’s so worth it,” said the
34-year-old former teacher. “They do everything
in depth: when they are learning about the colour
purple, they paint the walls purple, dress in
purple and have live musicians in every day
singing songs about purple.”
Quinn
said intense competition for pre-school places
was spreading. “It started in New York,
when middle-class parents decided to stay in
Manhattan rather than fly to the suburbs, meaning
the supply of good nursery schools lagged behind
demand; and now it’s almost as bad in
LA, Atlanta and Boston.”
Quinn
said she felt sorry for one client called Susan,
a single mother who hired an actor to play her
husband for a kindergarten interview only to
suffer an “unfortunate divorce”
before her first parents’ evening.
Another
parent trained an older son to pose as his four-year-old
brother for the exams and interview. “And
then you have to coach (the parents) in writing
their essay about why they think the school
should accept their child,” added Quinn.
Tests
change up the ladder. Toddlers are observed
to see how they get on with their peers, while
a two-year-old might be asked to sing a song.
But at the end of nursery a psychological profile
is prepared for the chosen kindergarten.
One
facilitator said she was asked by an LA couple
to hire a hacker to access the e-mailed report.
“They wanted the words ‘little angel’
and ‘credit to our nursery’ inserted,”
she said.
—John
Harlow, The Sunday Times
12/12/2004 |
|
|
|
Zeta-Jones
in Warners' 'Ivy' League
CATHERINE
ZETA-JONES AND HER "OCEAN'S TWELVE"
PRODUCER JERRY WEINTRAUB are
reteaming on a new dramedy, "The
Ivy Chronicles," for Warner Bros.
Pictures.
Based
on a novel by author Karen Quinn, "Ivy"
centers on a former highflying Wall Street
woman who, after losing her job and finding
her husband in bed with the wife of her
replacement, establishes a kindergarten
referral service for well-heeled Manhattanites
vying to get their tots into the country's
choice schools. |
Quinn's novel will be published in February
by Viking Books.
Zeta-Jones
will star in the film adaptation, which
Weintraub is producing. Jessica Goodman
is overseeing for the studio.
Zeta-Jones
has recently been at work on "The
Mask of Zorro" sequel, "Legend
of Zorro," as well as "Ocean's
Twelve." Other projects she has in
the pipeline include "Smoke &
Mirrors," from director Mimi Leder,
and "Coming Out," a rugby feature
set in Zeta-Jones' native Wales.
Weintraub's
other projects include the remake of "Oh,
God!" to star Ellen DeGeneres; a
new installment of "Police Academy";
and "Ancient History," written
by Darren Lemke.
Zeta-Jones
is repped by CAA.
—Liza
Foreman, The Hollywood Reporter
11/17/2004 |
|
|
Two
Days, Two Big Buys
VIKING'S
PAM DORMAN STAYED UP LATE two nights
in a row recently reading two big new debut
women's novels and ended up winning one of them
at auction and rapidly preempting the other.
The auction win was of Telling Tales Out of
School by Karen Quinn, a comic saga of upscale
New Yorkers' shenanigans to get their infants
into the best kindergartens (shades of The Nanny
Diaries!). This was a North American rights
buy from agent Robin Straus, with Andrew Nurnberg
in London handling U.K. and translation, and
CAA the movie rights. The preempt was of Capturing
Light by Kim Edwards, a touching family saga
by an award-winning short story writer. The
agent here was Geri Thoma at Elaine Markson,
also a North American rights deal. Both novels
are aimed at the spring 2005 season.
—John
F. Baker, Publisher's Weekly
9/22/2003 |
|
|
|
|